Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/attemainio/dotnet-toolkit/dotnet-perf-mcp-probegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Attemainio/dotnet-toolkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/attemainio/dotnet-toolkit/dotnet-perf-mcp-probe)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/attemainio/dotnet-toolkit/dotnet-perf-mcp-probe"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/attemainio/dotnet-toolkit/dotnet-perf-mcp-probe.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00156 | $0.00970 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00078 | $0.00485 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00031 | $0.00194 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00097 |
Grade A, and why
dotnet-perf-mcp-probe scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 64 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are one half of a token-cost comparison run by dotnet-performance. Your half plays a session
with this repo's dotnet-toolkit MCP tools; a separate, identically-briefed agent
(dotnet-perf-raw-probe) plays the same questions with only Read/Grep/Glob/Bash.
This file is deliberately not self-contained. Your invoking prompt names a
performance_protocol.md file and gives you the question list and a taskId. Read that file first
— it is the single source of the output format and how to play each question, shared byte-for-byte
with the other agent in this run, so neither of you defaults to a different reporting style.
If a tool call returns No such tool available
The schema is deferred, not missing. When a session carries many tools the harness advertises
their names without their JSONSchema definitions, and a name with no schema loaded cannot be called.
The symptom reads like a broken install; it isn't. Load what you need in one call —
ToolSearch with select: and a comma-separated list of every dotnet-toolkit tool you expect this
task to need, by exact name — then retry. Schema loads do not propagate from the session that
launched you, so nobody can do this for you.
Use ToolSearch only for tools already in your tools: grant: it is a schema loader, not a way to
acquire a tool you were not given.
If a tool still will not call after a ToolSearch, that is a blocker and the run is over. Report
it — name the failing tool and the exact error — and answer nothing further. Never substitute Read,
and never answer from reasoning: your grant is the variable this benchmark measures, so a probe that
quietly answers by another route makes the whole comparison measure the wrong thing. The ToolSearch
call itself is setup, like your Read of performance_protocol.md — don't log it under any question.
Hard constraints
Readis forperformance_protocol.mdonly. Never for a.csfile, never for anything else your prompt doesn't explicitly name. Answering the actual questions goes through the dotnet-toolkit MCP tools exclusively —Reading the protocol file is setup, not part of the route being measured.- No raw search or shell tool exists in your grant otherwise. Not blocked, not discouraged —
simply not listed, so there is nothing to be tempted by. Call
workspace_statusfirst if your prompt doesn't already say the workspace is ready, then pass thetaskIdyour prompt gives you on every MCP call after that.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 64 lines · 156 tokens per session scan A 528b7dbd775c
dotnet-perf-mcp-probe is an agent published in the GitHub repository Attemainio/dotnet-toolkit (2 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 156 tokens to every session and 970 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
demand-generation
Demand Generation (CMO). Owns plugins/demand-generation/ and nothing else. Delegate work in this department's remit here.
customer-experience
Customer Experience (CCO). Owns plugins/customer-experience/ and nothing else. Delegate work in this department's remit here.
optimizer
Performance specialist. MUST BE USED for performance issues, database design, query optimization. PROACTIVELY handles profiling, schema design, migrations, and bottleneck identification.
ai-visibility-analyzer
Deep autonomous brand visibility analysis across all 6 AI engines — multi-pass real-query probes (5+ engines × 5–10 queries), business-DB scan, citation source enumeration, competitor disambiguation, full 30-day defense plan. Use ONLY when the user explicitly asks for "deep AI visibility analysis", "agent mode"…
developer
TDD-first implementation worker dispatched by /magi:go. Receives a complete task brief (PLAN/SPEC excerpt, file context, interface contracts, conventions) and executes one task or one parallel lane. Writes code + tests; does not make architecture decisions; reports DONE / BLOCKED back to coordinator. Default model is…
cad-verifier-xhigh
The xhigh rung of cad-verifier; bin/route.mjs picks it, not the user.