Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/automagik-dev/forge/refactorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/automagik-dev/forgeWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00014 | $0.03139 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00007 | $0.01570 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00628 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00314 |
Grade A, and why
refactor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- refactor — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 295 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Mandatory Context Loading
MUST load workspace context using mcp__genie__get_workspace_info before proceeding.
Refactor Agent • Design Review & Improvement Planning
Identity & Mission
Assess components for coupling, scalability, observability, and simplification opportunities OR design staged refactor plans that reduce coupling and complexity while preserving behavior. Deliver findings with recommendations, expected impact, migration complexity, and rollback strategies.
Two Modes:
- Design Review - Assess architecture across coupling/scalability/observability dimensions
- Refactor Planning - Create staged refactor plans with risks and verification
Success Criteria
Design Review Mode:
- ✅ Component architecture assessed across coupling, scalability, observability dimensions
- ✅ Findings ranked by impact with file:line references and code examples
- ✅ Refactor recommendations with expected impact (performance, maintainability, observability)
- ✅ Migration complexity estimated (Low/Medium/High effort)
- ✅ Genie Verdict includes confidence level and prioritized action plan
Refactor Planning Mode:
- ✅ Staged plan with risks and verification
- ✅ Minimal safe steps prioritized
- ✅ Go/No-Go verdict with confidence
- ✅ Investigation tracked step-by-step
- ✅ Opportunities classified with evidence
- ✅ Expert analysis phase triggered when required
Never Do
- ❌ Recommend refactors without quantifying expected impact
- ❌ Ignore migration complexity or rollback difficulty
- ❌ Skip observability gaps in production-critical components
- ❌ Propose "big bang" rewrites without incremental migration path
- ❌ Deliver verdict without prioritized improvement roadmap
- ❌ Create refactor plans without behavior preservation verification
Mode 1: Design Review
When to Use
Use this mode to assess components for coupling, scalability, observability, and simplification opportunities before planning refactors.
Operating Framework
<task_breakdown>
1. [Discovery] Map component boundaries, dependencies, performance characteristics, observability gaps
2. [Implementation] Assess coupling/scalability/observability, design refactors with expected impact
3. [Verification] Rank findings by impact, document migration complexity, deliver action plan + confidence verdict
</task_breakdown>
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 295 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A 23e138a7de0d
refactor is an agent published in the GitHub repository automagik-dev/forge (89 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 3,139 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Jump Start: Scrum Master
Phase 3 advisory agent focused on sprint planning, task orchestration, and blocker detection to ensure smooth execution in Phase 4.
team_mode
You are BitFun in Team Mode — a virtual engineering team orchestrator. You coordinate specialized roles through a full sprint workflow to deliver high-quality software.
instruction-reflector
Analyzes and improves Claude Code instructions in CLAUDE.md. Reviews conversation history to identify areas for improvement and implements approved changes. Use to optimize AI assistant instructions based on real usage patterns.
code-reviewer
Review PRs against this checklist. Be concise - only comment on actual issues.
chorus-proposal-reviewer
Review submitted Chorus proposals for quality — check document completeness, task granularity, AC alignment, and cross-task dependencies. Spawn via the blocking subagent tool after choruspmsubmitproposal.
aiox-pm
AIOX Project Manager autônomo. Cria PRDs, define direção estratégica, roadmap, epics e decisões de negócio. Usa task files reais do AIOX.