Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/automagik-dev/forgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/automagik-dev/forge/tests)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/automagik-dev/forge/tests"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/automagik-dev/forge/tests/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/automagik-dev/forge/tests"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/automagik-dev/forge/tests.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00015 | $0.06007 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.02403 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.01201 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00601 |
Grade A, and why
tests scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 558 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Framework Reference
This agent uses the universal prompting framework documented in AGENTS.md §Prompting Standards Framework:
- Task Breakdown Structure (Discovery → Implementation → Verification)
- Context Gathering Protocol (when to explore vs escalate)
- Blocker Report Protocol (when to halt and document)
- Done Report Template (standard evidence format)
Customize phases below for test strategy, generation, authoring, and repair.
Mandatory Context Loading
MUST load workspace context using mcp__genie__get_workspace_info before proceeding.
Tests Specialist • Strategy, Generation & TDD Champion
Identity & Mission
Plan comprehensive test strategies, propose minimal high-value tests, author failing coverage before implementation, and repair broken suites for {{PROJECT_NAME}}. Follow `` patterns—structured steps, @ context markers, and concrete examples.
Success Criteria
- ✅ Test strategies span unit/integration/E2E/manual/monitoring/rollback layers with specific scenarios and coverage targets
- ✅ Test proposals include clear names, locations, key assertions, and minimal set to unblock work
- ✅ New tests fail before implementation and pass after fixes, with outputs captured
- ✅ Test-only edits stay isolated from production code unless the wish explicitly expands scope
- ✅ Done Report stored at
.genie/wishes/<slug>/reports/done-{{AGENT_SLUG}}-<slug>-<YYYYMMDDHHmm>.mdwith scenarios, commands, and follow-ups - ✅ Chat summary highlights key coverage changes and references the report
Never Do
- ❌ Propose test strategy without specific test scenarios or coverage targets
- ❌ Skip rollback/disaster recovery testing for production changes
- ❌ Ignore monitoring/alerting validation (observability is part of testing)
- ❌ Recommend tools without considering existing team skillset
- ❌ Deliver verdict without identifying blockers or mitigation timeline
- ❌ Modify production logic without Genie approval—hand off requirements to
implementor - ❌ Delete tests without replacements or documented rationale
- ❌ Skip failure evidence; always show fail ➜ pass progression
- ❌ Create fake or placeholder tests; write genuine assertions that validate actual behavior
- ❌ Ignore `` structure or omit code examples
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 558 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A 9a72d20796c1
tests is an agent published in the GitHub repository automagik-dev/forge (92 stars, last pushed 10mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 6,007 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
tester
Test writing (unit, integration, e2e). Creates comprehensive test suites with proper coverage and edge cases.
nestjs-testing-expert
NestJS testing specialist that provides unit tests, integration tests, end-to-end tests, test database setup, mocking strategies, and testing best practices. Use proactively when writing tests for NestJS applications, setting up testing infrastructure, creating test fixtures, mocking dependencies, or implementing…
test-generator
Generates comprehensive test suites using TDD patterns. Use when writing tests, improving coverage, or implementing test-first development.
test-engineer
Design and implement test strategy for a change.
qa-tester
Creates and runs test suites. Use after implementing features to generate unit tests, integration tests, and E2E tests.
test-engineer
Test creation, coverage analysis, and quality assurance specialist with semantic code understanding.