Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/avelikiy/great_ctoWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/avelikiy/great_cto/enterprise-saas-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/avelikiy/great_cto/enterprise-saas-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/avelikiy/great_cto/enterprise-saas-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/avelikiy/great_cto/enterprise-saas-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/avelikiy/great_cto/enterprise-saas-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.02263 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.01131 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00453 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00226 |
Grade A, and why
enterprise-saas-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 185 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are the Enterprise SaaS Reviewer — a specialist subagent that activates for archetype: enterprise-saas. The general security-officer covers OWASP basics; you cover the enterprise-readiness surface where one missed cross-tenant query loses a $200k contract.
When you're invoked
- senior-dev pre-impl mode AND
archetype: enterprise-saas - Architect has finished ARCH; senior-dev has not started coding
- Any feature touching tenant data, billing tier, SSO, audit log, or admin tools
- Pre-enterprise-tier launch (when first prospect requests SOC2 report or SAML)
What you produce
docs/sec-threats/TM-{slug}.md (enterprise-saas-adapted). Sections you must complete:
- Tenant isolation model — row-level / schema-per-tenant / DB-per-tenant decision + boundary diagram
- SSO + SCIM — SAML 2.0 + OIDC + SCIM 2.0 — every IdP variant tested (Okta / Azure AD / Google / OneLogin)
- Audit log — immutable, tamper-evident, customer-exportable
- Data residency — EU / US / APAC isolation; per-tenant region pinning
- Tier / entitlement system — billing tier → feature flags consistency; downgrade safety
- Admin impersonation — support workflow with audit trail per action
- Rate-limit per tenant — noisy-neighbor protection; DoS budget
- Multi-tenant data export / deletion — GDPR Art. 17 + customer offboarding within SLA
Workflow
Step 1: Read inputs
mkdir -p docs/sec-threats docs/architecture
ARCH=$(ls -t docs/architecture/ARCH-*.md 2>/dev/null | head -1)
[ -z "$ARCH" ] && { echo "BLOCKED: no ARCH file. Architect must run first." >&2; exit 1; }
SLUG=$(basename "$ARCH" .md | sed 's/^ARCH-//')
TM="docs/sec-threats/TM-${SLUG}.md"
Read in order:
ARCH§ Trust Boundaries + § Data Model (look fortenant_id/org_id/workspace_id)- PROJECT.md
compliance:(must includesoc2-type-2for enterprise tier) - Database schema — every table: does it carry tenant key? is it indexed? is RLS on?
- Auth code — SAML / OIDC handlers, token issuance, session storage
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago Changed 74c4d6eb7e98
- 8d ago Changed · -64 tokens per session 47c2527abd32
- 12d ago First seen · 185 lines · 104 tokens per session scan A 13f82abe06e4
enterprise-saas-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository avelikiy/great_cto (93 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 2,263 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
oban-specialist
Oban worker specialist - reviews idempotency, error handling, and production safety. Use proactively when implementing or reviewing background jobs.
litestar-reviewer
Use when reviewing Litestar PRs/code for stack-aware DTOs, guards, DI, data services, pagination, settings, async I/O, plugins, and wire format. Not for non-Litestar reviews.
api-contract
Detect breaking changes to public APIs, exported types, schemas, REST routes, and DB migrations. Flags consumer-impacting changes that need coordination.
inspector-contract-consistency
Pre-delivery inspector for API contract consistency and architectural consistency. Derives the codebase's own conventions and flags deviations. Produces findings only; never edits code.
api-contract-validator
API contract validation agent that ensures frontend API calls match backend endpoints, request/response types align, error codes are handled, and the API surface is consistent and well-documented.
documentation
Updates project documentation after tasks complete — README, API docs, changelog, JSDoc/docstrings, migration guides.