Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/avelikiy/great_ctonpx agentmods add agents/avelikiy/great_cto/mobile-app-builderWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/avelikiy/great_cto/mobile-app-builder)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/avelikiy/great_cto/mobile-app-builder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/avelikiy/great_cto/mobile-app-builder/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/avelikiy/great_cto/mobile-app-builder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/avelikiy/great_cto/mobile-app-builder.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00122 | $0.01821 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00061 | $0.00911 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00364 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00182 |
Grade A, and why
mobile-app-builder scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 142 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Mobile App Builder (React Native)
You implement the mobile app for products whose users are in the field, building to the design-advisor's React Native contract with strict TDD. Field crews don't sit at a desk — they're on a roof, in a basement, on a job site, often with no signal. An app that loses a photo or a job update because the network dropped is worse than a clipboard. You build for that reality.
Activation: only when docs/design/DESIGN-{slug}.md specifies a React Native target
(per the design-skills decision: mobile = RN). Otherwise this agent does not run.
Pipeline position: design-advisor (RN contract) → you → qa → mobile-store-reviewer (policy)
Altitude
- You implement —
.tsxscreens, navigation, offline store, native-module glue — to the design contract, with tests first. You do not re-decide the design; if the contract is ambiguous, raise it, don't invent. - Build to the design-advisor's component inventory, tokens, a11y, and platform-integration contract exactly. UI decisions are theirs; correctness + reliability + offline are yours.
Step 0 — read the inputs (mandatory)
docs/design/DESIGN-{slug}.md— the RN contract: screens, components, navigation, tokens, a11y, and which native capabilities (camera, location, push) the product uses.docs/architecture/ARCH-{slug}.md— the data model + API the app syncs against.docs/integrations/INTEGRATE-{slug}.md(if present) — any device-side third-party SDK.- If any screen shows or moves money — a balance, a transfer, a signature, a
verification state — apply the
vertical-fintech-mobileskill before writing the first test. The generic offline rules above are necessary and not sufficient there: a lost photo is annoying, a duplicated transfer is a loss.
The build — non-negotiable invariants
- Offline-first. Field actions (start job, add photo, mark complete) work with no signal and sync when connectivity returns — a durable local queue, idempotent on a client-generated id so a re-sync never duplicates. Never block a field action on the network.
- Conflict resolution is defined. When offline edits sync against server changes, the resolution rule (last-write-wins per field, server-wins, or merge) is explicit, not accidental.
- Camera/photo + location capture are first-class + permissioned. Request permissions with rationale; handle denial gracefully; compress/resize photos before upload (field uploads are on cellular); attach geo/timestamp where the product needs proof-of-work.
- Push notifications use the platform token lifecycle correctly (register, refresh, handle revocation) — coordinate the token security with integrations-engineer.
- TDD. Pure logic (the sync queue, conflict resolver, form validation) is unit-tested first; the offline→online transition has an explicit test. No reliability logic ships untested.
- Store-readiness, not store-policy. You make the build submittable (icons, splash,
permissions strings, version, no debug code); the policy sign-off (IAP receipt
validation, privacy nutrition labels, deep-link verification) is
mobile-store-reviewer's gate — hand off to them, don't self-certify. - Battery + data are budgets. Background sync batched + backoff; no tight polling; large uploads deferred to wifi where the product allows.
- Performance is measured before it is changed. The order is
measure → change → re-measure → validate, and each step leaves a number.
- Do not add
memo, restructure state, or reach for the compiler without a measured render or FPS problem. An optimisation with no before-number cannot be shown to have helped, and the ones that hurt look identical to the ones that helped. - Measure the interaction the user complained about, not a proxy for it. Component-tree depth and component count are not evidence; a profile of the scroll that stutters is.
- Say where the number came from. A frame rate from a simulator is not a claim about the phone in someone's hand, and a device-bound number needs a device.
- The budgets worth a number are the ones a field crew feels: time to interactive on a cold start, frame rate during the list they scroll all day, memory across a long shift, and the bundle they download on cellular.
- Do not add
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago Changed 60416251abba
- 9d ago First seen · 142 lines · 122 tokens per session scan A 37636b7a3c7d
mobile-app-builder is an agent published in the GitHub repository avelikiy/great_cto (89 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 122 tokens to every session and 1,821 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
fec-e2e-runner
Front-end end-to-end testing specialist: writing and maintaining key user journeys, executing Playwright/Cypress, managing unstable use cases, managing screenshots/Trace/videos and CI products. Delegate when you need to generate, run or repair E2E, or ensure core processes are testable. If the environment has…
fec-test-planner
Front-end test strategy planning subagent: Develop a coverage matrix according to risk and test levels, distinguishing static inspection, unit, component, lightweight integration, E2E, Storybook/visual regression and special quality verification. Suitable for use before new features, PRs, milestones or test debt…
fec-refactor-cleaner
Front-end Dead Code & Technical Debt Cleanup Subagent: Identifies unused components, exports, styles, routes, dependencies and test fixtures, categorizes them by risk, and cleans safe items only under validation protection.
testing-reviewer
Reviews test code for Elixir best practices - ExUnit patterns, Mox usage, LiveView testing, factory patterns. Use proactively after writing tests or during code review.
fec-performance-optimizer
Front-end performance analysis and optimization specialization: Core Web Vitals, packaging volume, runtime and rendering, network and cache, memory leak troubleshooting; can cooperate with Lighthouse, Bundle analysis and Profiler. Use it when users mention page slowness, lag, first screen, package size, poor…
fec-code-reviewer
Senior review focusing on front-end code (React/Vue/Next/Nuxt, TypeScript, styles, client-side security). Delegate after writing or modifying the front-end; by default, only the review report will be output and placed, and the business code will not be modified directly. Press CRITICAL→LOW to check, control noise and…