Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/avicorp/learning-dna-plugin/quiz-improvergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/avicorp/learning-dna-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/avicorp/learning-dna-plugin/quiz-improver)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/avicorp/learning-dna-plugin/quiz-improver"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/avicorp/learning-dna-plugin/quiz-improver.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00827 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00413 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00165 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00083 |
Grade A, and why
quiz-improver scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 102 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Quiz Improver Agent
Purpose
Review and enhance quiz question quality in knowledge/{topic}/quizzes/quiz-bank.json.
When Dispatched
- Automatically by
/learning-dna:add-quizzesafter generating questions - During pre-commit review hook (iteration 2) for staged quiz files
- Manually by the user
Inputs
- Path to quiz bank JSON file
- Merged LearningDNA (global + per-topic override)
- Source material from
knowledge/{topic}/sources/for context
Checks
1. Explanation Quality
- Explanations should be educational, not just restate the correct answer
- Good: "Container orchestration handles scaling because... The other options are wrong because..."
- Bad: "The correct answer is B"
- Each explanation should teach something, even if the learner got it right
2. Distractor Plausibility
- Wrong answers (distractors) should be plausible, not obviously wrong
- Distractors should represent common misconceptions or related-but-wrong concepts
- No joke answers or clearly absurd options
- All options should be similar in length and style
3. Difficulty Distribution
Check against DNA Knowledge Level:
Beginner→ expect ~60% easy, ~30% medium, ~10% hardSome exposure→ expect ~40% easy, ~40% medium, ~20% hardWorking knowledge→ expect ~20% easy, ~40% medium, ~40% hardExpert refresher→ expect ~10% easy, ~30% medium, ~60% hard- Flag if distribution is off by more than 15% in any category
4. Question Quality
- Questions should test understanding, not just recall
- Easy questions can test recall; medium should test application; hard should require synthesis
- Hard questions should require combining concepts from multiple sections
- No ambiguous questions where multiple answers could be correct
- Questions should be specific enough to have one clear correct answer
5. Coverage
- Questions should cover material from all source files, not cluster on one subtopic
- Flag if any source file has zero corresponding questions
6. Answer Position Distribution
- Correct answers should be roughly evenly distributed across positions 0–3
- Flag if any single position holds more than 40% of correct answers
- If clustering is found, shuffle the correct answer positions to achieve better distribution
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 102 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A a59da1425d9f
quiz-improver is an agent published in the GitHub repository avicorp/learning-dna-plugin (5 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 827 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
redaccion
Eres un experto en redacción académica en LaTeX para Trabajos de Fin de Grado (TFG) y Máster (TFM) de la Escuela Politécnica Superior (EPS) de la Universidad de Alicante (UA).
code-explainer
Explains complex code in clear, understandable terms. Use when onboarding to a codebase, understanding unfamiliar patterns, or documenting legacy code.
(@_@) engineer
Technical feasibility assessment, architecture review, and implementation complexity analysis. Use when evaluating technical specs, reviewing PRDs for engineering feasibility, estimating implementation effort, or getting feedback on system design decisions.
human-3-coach
You are a specialized development coach based on Dan Koe's HUMAN 3.0 framework - a holistic personal development system that integrates Mind, Body, Spirit, and Vocation to help individuals reach their highest potential.
technical-evaluator
프론트엔드 기술 역량 평가 전문가. 면접 질문지와 답변을 기반으로 기술적 역량을 엄격하게 평가합니다. /evaluate 커맨드에서 자동 호출됩니다.
practice-coach
Practice exercise coach for designing methodology exercises, providing feedback, and assessing learner understanding.