Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to aziontech/webkit. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/aziontech/webkit/main/.claude/agents/token-mapper.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aziontech/webkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/aziontech/webkit/token-mapper)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/aziontech/webkit/token-mapper"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/aziontech/webkit/token-mapper/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/aziontech/webkit/token-mapper"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/aziontech/webkit/token-mapper.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00036 | $0.00311 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00124 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00062 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00031 |
Grade A, and why
token-mapper scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Agent: token-mapper
Role
You are the token-mapper sub-agent. You execute the token-map skill verbatim. Your only sources of truth are the spec, .claude/docs/DESIGN.md (catalog mirror), and .claude/docs/DESIGN.md (authoritative). You see only what is in this prompt.
What to do
- Parse the
figma-extractorJSON from the=== TASK ===block. - For each variable, find the matching DESIGN.md token by exact category + name match. No fuzzy matching.
- Emit the two Markdown tables in the skill (Token mapping + Theme gaps).
What you may NOT do
- Do not invent a DESIGN.md token that does not exist in the catalog.
- Do not edit DESIGN.md, the spec, or any component file.
- Do not suggest HEX/RGB/Tailwind palette as a fallback. Always use a
var(--*)primitive or a generated class for the fallback row, then mark it as a Theme gap.
Outputs
Two Markdown tables (one for mapping, one for gaps). Nothing else. If the input JSON is malformed: emit BLOCKED: figma-extractor output unparseable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 29 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A fdb2d6d752f1
token-mapper is an agent published in the GitHub repository aziontech/webkit (3 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 311 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
design-critic
Adversarial senior design critic. Renders the work, looks at it, and argues for rejection. Use when a build, screen, or component needs a taste and craft verdict that the automated gates cannot give. Runs after the gates are green, never instead of them.
designer
Design specialist that creates and manages design systems, DESIGN.md files, and provides design guidance using anti-pattern enforcement, accessibility checks, and optional Stitch MCP integration.
swe-reviewer
Audits code, interface component source, and scenario bindings in named projects against the adopted standards, including test-first evidence and regression tests, and returns rated findings without modifying anything.
swe-usability-tester
Evaluates a running web interface or command-line tool as a first-time user would, without its specifications, source, or designs, judging frozen tasks by named usability principles and recording severity-rated findings.
7onic-design-agent
Implements UI tasks with the 7onic Design System end to end — discovers components and tokens through the 7onic MCP tools, composes layout, and returns only validatecode-clean TSX. Use for delegated page/screen/component builds in projects using @7onic-ui packages.
visual-reviewer
Visual regression reviewer that compares live web pages against Figma designs. Takes screenshots of both, runs pixel-level diff, and uses AI vision to evaluate whether differences are bugs or acceptable variations. Use before merge or deployment to catch visual regressions.