js-fp-review

js-fp-review is an agent for Claude Code from bdfinst/agentic-dev-team. It costs 29 tokens per session (1,782 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A JavaScript and TypeScript code-review agent that checks for changes to arrays or function inputs, shared state, hidden side effects, and certain composition patterns.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is for reviewing JavaScript and TypeScript files, reporting mutation and side-effect problems, and suggesting clearer functional-style patterns.
Why use it?
It helps reveal code that changes data unexpectedly or hides actions inside calculations, which can make behavior harder to understand and maintain.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: effort in frontmatter. Also seen: model in frontmatter.

Runs only inside its plugin — its command needs a path that Claude Code sets for a plugin’s own hooks and for nothing else. Install the plugin, not this.

Part of the dev-team plugin — 98 skills, 54 agents, 4 hooks shipped together

Good fit It is for reviewing JavaScript and TypeScript files, reporting mutation and side-effect problems, and suggesting clearer functional-style patterns.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install

Getting it into your agent

This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.

Claude Code
/plugin marketplace add bdfinst/agentic-dev-team
Claude Code
/plugin install dev-team

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install dev-team, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 98 skills, 54 agents, 4 hooks.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for js-fp-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bdfinst/agentic-dev-team/js-fp-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/bdfinst/agentic-dev-team/js-fp-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/bdfinst/agentic-dev-team/js-fp-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bdfinst/agentic-dev-team/js-fp-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for js-fp-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/bdfinst/agentic-dev-team/js-fp-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bdfinst/agentic-dev-team/js-fp-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 29 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,782 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00029 $0.01782
Opus 5.5 $0.00012 $0.00713
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00006 $0.00356
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00178

Measured 17d ago against content hash 9bb8e22229d2, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

js-fp-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 17d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/dev-team/agents/js-fp-review.md · 115 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 115 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

JS FP Review

Scope:

  • **/*.js
  • **/*.ts
  • **/*.jsx
  • **/*.tsx
  • **/*.mjs
  • **/*.cjs Cites: [adversarial-review-protocol]

Scope: JavaScript and TypeScript files only (.js, .ts, .jsx, .tsx, .mjs, .cjs). Skip this agent entirely if the project has no JS/TS files.

Output JSON: per ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/knowledge/review-agent-output-contract.md (Whole-file load: short, canonical schema).

Status: pass=no mutations or impure patterns, warn=only style/point-free suggestions, fail=external mutation or a buried side effect Severity: error=external state mutation or a side effect buried inside a value-returning computation, warning=local mutation, suggestion=style (point-free/composition) Confidence: high=mechanical substitution (push→spread, let→const); medium=pattern clear but spread vs clone depends on usage, or extracting a console/DOM side effect; none=requires human judgment (intentional mutation for performance, or removing a non-deterministic read whose value is actually used downstream)

Context needs: diff-only

Skip

Return {"status": "skip", "issues": [], "summary": "No JS/TS files in target"} when:

  • No .js, .ts, .jsx, .tsx, .mjs, or .cjs files exist in the target
  • All target files are non-JavaScript/TypeScript

Detect

Variable declarations:

  • let never reassigned → use const
  • var → use const/let
  • Exception: prefixes mut/mutable/_ indicate intentional mutability

Array mutations (flag and suggest):

  • .push() → [...arr, item]
  • .pop() → arr.slice(0, -1)
  • .shift() → arr.slice(1)
  • .unshift() → [item, ...arr]
  • .splice() → slice + spread
  • .reverse() → [...arr].reverse() or toReversed()
  • .sort() → [...arr].sort() or toSorted()
  • .fill() → map
  • Exception: mutations on spread copies [...arr].sort() allowed

Object mutations:

  • param.prop = value (parameter mutation)
  • param[key] = value (parameter mutation)
  • delete param.prop
  • Object.assign(existingObj, ...) → spread or new object target
  • Exception: this.property in class methods allowed

Read the full file on GitHub · 115 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 17d ago Changed · +9 lines 9bb8e22229d2
  2. 1mo ago First seen · 106 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A 784b0092dc61

Subscribe to this mod's changes

js-fp-review is an agent published in the GitHub repository bdfinst/agentic-dev-team (295 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 1,782 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

cpp-reviewer

Expert C++ code reviewer specializing in memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and performance. Use for all C++ code changes. MUST BE USED for C++ projects.

affaan-m/ECC · 41 tokens

thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagent

Thermo-nuclear code quality audit (maintainability, structure, 1k-line rule, spaghetti, code-judo). Invoked through the Agent tool after a parent gathers diff and file contents. Loads rubric from the thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review skill in this plugin.

michael-denyer/pstack-claude · 68 tokens

karimo-implementer

Executes coding tasks (complexity 1-4) from KARIMO PRDs. Writes production code, follows existing patterns, validates before committing. Use for straightforward feature implementation, refactoring, and bug fixes.

opensesh/KARIMO · 49 tokens

reviewer

Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…

genkovich/sdd · 81 tokens

atomic-auditor

Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…

damusix/atomic-claude · 169 tokens

Reviewer

Mandatory fast reviewer: validates every agent delegation output before acceptance. Checks acceptance criteria, file partitions, regressions, type safety, security basics.

monkilabs/opencastle · 30 tokens