performance-review

performance-review is an agent for Claude Code from bdfinst/agentic-dev-team. It costs 21 tokens per session (1,236 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A code-review agent that looks for performance problems such as resource leaks, repeated database queries, unlimited growth, slow algorithms, and missing time limits.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is for reviewing runtime code that uses input/output, loops, or data structures and reporting performance risks with their severity and confidence.
Why use it?
It helps find code that may slow down, consume too many resources, or fail under larger workloads before those problems reach users.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: effort in frontmatter. Also seen: model in frontmatter.

Runs only inside its plugin — its command needs a path that Claude Code sets for a plugin’s own hooks and for nothing else. Install the plugin, not this.

Part of the dev-team plugin — 98 skills, 54 agents, 4 hooks shipped together

Good fit It is for reviewing runtime code that uses input/output, loops, or data structures and reporting performance risks with their severity and confidence.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install

Getting it into your agent

This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.

Claude Code
/plugin marketplace add bdfinst/agentic-dev-team
Claude Code
/plugin install dev-team

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install dev-team, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 98 skills, 54 agents, 4 hooks.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for performance-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bdfinst/agentic-dev-team/performance-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/bdfinst/agentic-dev-team/performance-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/bdfinst/agentic-dev-team/performance-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bdfinst/agentic-dev-team/performance-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for performance-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/bdfinst/agentic-dev-team/performance-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bdfinst/agentic-dev-team/performance-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 21 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,236 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00021 $0.01236
Opus 5.5 $0.00008 $0.00494
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00004 $0.00247
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00124

Measured 17d ago against content hash c73e63a0a257, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

performance-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 17d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/dev-team/agents/performance-review.md · 106 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 106 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Performance Review

Scope: always Cites: [adversarial-review-protocol]

Output JSON: per ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/knowledge/review-agent-output-contract.md (Whole-file load: short, canonical schema).

Status: pass=no performance issues, warn=potential bottlenecks, fail=critical performance defects Severity: error=resource leak or unbounded growth, warning=likely bottleneck, suggestion=optimization opportunity Confidence: high=mechanical fix (add finally, add size limit, move query out of loop); medium=pattern identified but optimal solution depends on data volume; none=requires human judgment (caching strategy, algorithm selection)

Context needs: full-file

Skip

Return {"status": "skip", "issues": [], "summary": "No performance-relevant patterns in target"} when:

  • Target contains only configuration, documentation, or type definitions
  • No runtime code with I/O, loops, or data structures

Detect

Resource leaks:

  • Unclosed database connections, file handles, streams, sockets
  • Missing finally/using/defer/with for resource cleanup
  • Event listeners added without corresponding removal
  • Timers without cleanup on teardown — JS/TS: setInterval/setTimeout without clearInterval/clearTimeout; C#: System.Timers.Timer without Dispose(); Java: ScheduledExecutorService without shutdown()

N+1 patterns:

  • Database queries inside loops
  • API calls inside loops without batching
  • Sequential I/O that could be parallel

Unbounded growth:

  • Caches without size limits or eviction — JS/TS: Map/plain object growing forever; C#: Dictionary or MemoryCache without size limits; Java: HashMap or ConcurrentHashMap without eviction policy
  • Arrays accumulating without bounds in long-lived processes
  • Event listener accumulation (adding listeners in loops or repeated calls)
  • Unbounded queue or buffer growth

Timeouts and degradation:

  • Network calls without timeout configuration
  • Missing circuit breakers on external service calls
  • No fallback for degraded dependencies
  • Blocking operations on latency-sensitive threads — JS/TS: blocking the event loop with CPU-heavy synchronous work; C#: blocking the ASP.NET thread pool with .Result/.Wait(); Java: blocking a servlet or reactive thread with Thread.sleep() or Future.get()

Read the full file on GitHub · 106 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 17d ago Changed · +8 lines c73e63a0a257
  2. 1mo ago First seen · 98 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A 296137af3487

Subscribe to this mod's changes

performance-review is an agent published in the GitHub repository bdfinst/agentic-dev-team (295 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 1,236 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

cpp-reviewer

Expert C++ code reviewer specializing in memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and performance. Use for all C++ code changes. MUST BE USED for C++ projects.

affaan-m/ECC · 41 tokens

thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagent

Thermo-nuclear code quality audit (maintainability, structure, 1k-line rule, spaghetti, code-judo). Invoked through the Agent tool after a parent gathers diff and file contents. Loads rubric from the thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review skill in this plugin.

michael-denyer/pstack-claude · 68 tokens

karimo-implementer

Executes coding tasks (complexity 1-4) from KARIMO PRDs. Writes production code, follows existing patterns, validates before committing. Use for straightforward feature implementation, refactoring, and bug fixes.

opensesh/KARIMO · 49 tokens

reviewer

Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…

genkovich/sdd · 81 tokens

atomic-auditor

Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…

damusix/atomic-claude · 169 tokens

Reviewer

Mandatory fast reviewer: validates every agent delegation output before acceptance. Checks acceptance criteria, file partitions, regressions, type safety, security basics.

monkilabs/opencastle · 30 tokens