Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add bdfinst/agentic-dev-team/plugin install dev-teamWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/bdfinst/agentic-dev-team/performance-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/bdfinst/agentic-dev-team/performance-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bdfinst/agentic-dev-team/performance-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/bdfinst/agentic-dev-team/performance-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bdfinst/agentic-dev-team/performance-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.01236 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00494 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00247 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00124 |
Grade A, and why
performance-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 17d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 106 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Performance Review
Scope: always Cites: [adversarial-review-protocol]
Output JSON: per ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/knowledge/review-agent-output-contract.md (Whole-file load: short, canonical schema).
Status: pass=no performance issues, warn=potential bottlenecks, fail=critical performance defects Severity: error=resource leak or unbounded growth, warning=likely bottleneck, suggestion=optimization opportunity Confidence: high=mechanical fix (add finally, add size limit, move query out of loop); medium=pattern identified but optimal solution depends on data volume; none=requires human judgment (caching strategy, algorithm selection)
Context needs: full-file
Skip
Return {"status": "skip", "issues": [], "summary": "No performance-relevant patterns in target"} when:
- Target contains only configuration, documentation, or type definitions
- No runtime code with I/O, loops, or data structures
Detect
Resource leaks:
- Unclosed database connections, file handles, streams, sockets
- Missing
finally/using/defer/withfor resource cleanup - Event listeners added without corresponding removal
- Timers without cleanup on teardown — JS/TS:
setInterval/setTimeoutwithoutclearInterval/clearTimeout; C#:System.Timers.TimerwithoutDispose(); Java:ScheduledExecutorServicewithoutshutdown()
N+1 patterns:
- Database queries inside loops
- API calls inside loops without batching
- Sequential I/O that could be parallel
Unbounded growth:
- Caches without size limits or eviction — JS/TS:
Map/plain object growing forever; C#:DictionaryorMemoryCachewithout size limits; Java:HashMaporConcurrentHashMapwithout eviction policy - Arrays accumulating without bounds in long-lived processes
- Event listener accumulation (adding listeners in loops or repeated calls)
- Unbounded queue or buffer growth
Timeouts and degradation:
- Network calls without timeout configuration
- Missing circuit breakers on external service calls
- No fallback for degraded dependencies
- Blocking operations on latency-sensitive threads — JS/TS: blocking the event loop with CPU-heavy synchronous work; C#: blocking the ASP.NET thread pool with
.Result/.Wait(); Java: blocking a servlet or reactive thread withThread.sleep()orFuture.get()
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 17d ago Changed · +8 lines c73e63a0a257
- 1mo ago First seen · 98 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A 296137af3487
performance-review is an agent published in the GitHub repository bdfinst/agentic-dev-team (295 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 1,236 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
cpp-reviewer
Expert C++ code reviewer specializing in memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and performance. Use for all C++ code changes. MUST BE USED for C++ projects.
thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagent
Thermo-nuclear code quality audit (maintainability, structure, 1k-line rule, spaghetti, code-judo). Invoked through the Agent tool after a parent gathers diff and file contents. Loads rubric from the thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review skill in this plugin.
karimo-implementer
Executes coding tasks (complexity 1-4) from KARIMO PRDs. Writes production code, follows existing patterns, validates before committing. Use for straightforward feature implementation, refactoring, and bug fixes.
reviewer
Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…
Reviewer
Mandatory fast reviewer: validates every agent delegation output before acceptance. Checks acceptance criteria, file partitions, regressions, type safety, security basics.