spec-compliance-review

spec-compliance-review is an agent for coding agents from bdfinst/agentic-dev-team. It costs 14 tokens per session (1,084 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A code-review check that compares changed code with the written requirements and planned behavior before other quality checks run.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to verify that every requirement has an implementation and a test, including behavior described in Gherkin scenarios, a plain-text format for describing software behavior.
Why use it?
It catches missing requirements and untested acceptance criteria early, before time is spent reviewing code quality.

Agent

Installs and runs on its own, but its text points at files inside its plugin — anything it tells you to read at a ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT} path is only there once the plugin is installed. Installing the plugin gets both.

Part of the dev-team plugin — 46 agents shipped together

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/bdfinst/agentic-dev-team/spec-compliance-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bdfinst/agentic-dev-team

Or install dev-team, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 46 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for spec-compliance-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bdfinst/agentic-dev-team/spec-compliance-review.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/bdfinst/agentic-dev-team/spec-compliance-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/bdfinst/agentic-dev-team/spec-compliance-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bdfinst/agentic-dev-team/spec-compliance-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 14 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,084 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00014 $0.01084
Opus 5 $0.00007 $0.00542
Sonnet 5 $0.00003 $0.00217
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00108

Measured 4d ago against content hash 1002f1f16490, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

spec-compliance-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/dev-team/agents/spec-compliance-review.md · 101 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 101 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Spec Compliance Review

Scope: always Cites:

  • adversarial-review-protocol
  • directory-enumeration

Context needs: full-file File scope: All changed files

What This Agent Checks

This agent answers one question: does the code do what the spec says? It runs as the first gate before quality review agents. If spec compliance fails, there's no point checking code quality.

Detection Patterns

Unmet acceptance criteria

  • Read acceptance criteria from the spec (docs/specs/<slug>.md), plan, and/or design doc — or, on a repo that opted into /specs' issue-first persistence convention, from the linked spec GitHub issue if the plan records a --spec-issue <url> reference instead of a docs/specs/** file (see /specs' "Persist to GitHub issue" step)
  • For each criterion, locate the implementation that satisfies it
  • For each criterion, locate the test that validates it
  • Flag criteria with no implementation or no test

Uncovered scenarios

  • Read the per-slice Gherkin scenarios from the plan (or any .feature files, if the project keeps them)
  • For each scenario, locate the corresponding test
  • Flag scenarios with no test or with a test that doesn't match the scenario steps

Scope violations

  • Identify code changes not traceable to any acceptance criterion
  • Flag unrequested features, refactoring, or behavior changes beyond spec

Plan deviation

  • Compare the implementation to the plan's file-change list
  • Flag files modified that aren't in the plan (unless trivially related)
  • Flag planned changes that weren't made

Output Format

{
  "agentName": "spec-compliance-review",
  "status": "pass|warn|fail|skip",
  "issues": [
    {
      "file": "<file path>",
      "line": null,
      "severity": "error|warning|suggestion",
      "message": "<what's wrong>",
      "category": "unmet-criterion|uncovered-scenario|scope-violation|plan-deviation",
      "criterion": "<the acceptance criterion or scenario name>",
      "suggestedFix": "<what to do>",
      "confidence": "high|medium|none"
    }
  ],
  "criteria_coverage": {"met": 0, "unmet": 0, "partial": 0},
  "scenario_coverage": {"covered": 0, "uncovered": 0, "partial": 0},
  "summary": "<one line>"
}

Read the full file on GitHub · 101 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 4d ago First seen · 101 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A 1002f1f16490

Subscribe to this mod's changes

spec-compliance-review is an agent published in the GitHub repository bdfinst/agentic-dev-team (280 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 1,084 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

spec-compliance-reviewer

Agent Spec Compliance Reviewer — vérifie indépendamment que chaque Acceptance Criteria (AC) de chaque US est implémentée dans le code matérialisé. Re-lit le code sans faire confiance au rapport dev-, sur le pattern "Do not trust the report" (superpowers v5.1). Produit spec-compliance.{md,json} avec verdict 🟢/🟡/🔴…

zekiriabd/SDD-Pro · 104 tokens

atomic-auditor

Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…

damusix/atomic-claude · 169 tokens

code-quality-reviewer

Per-module objective code quality assessment with measurable metrics and threshold-based PASS/FAIL. Produces reviews/phase-6-review/code-review.md. Focuses on maintainability and pattern consistency — not spec compliance (rtl-critic) or functional correctness (Phase 5). (Opus).

babyworm/rtl-agent-team · 62 tokens

audit-geo

Evaluates AI crawler access, llms.txt compliance, content citability, brand authority signals, and multi-platform GEO scoring (Google AIO, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Bing Copilot).

XuanRanL/loamwright-SEO-Skill · 44 tokens

ui-visual-validator

Rigorous visual validation expert specializing in UI testing, design system compliance, and accessibility verification. Masters screenshot analysis, visual regression testing, and component validation. Use PROACTIVELY to verify UI modifications have achieved their intended goals through comprehensive visual analysis.

Dicklesworthstone/pi_agent_rust · 54 tokens

investigative-reporter-agent

Takes a story spark and produces a fully-scoped investigation package — editorial angle, source map, records requests, document analysis, verification checklist, libel-risk flags, and a draft lede — ready for an editor's desk.

ur-grue/autopunk-media-skills · 6 tokens