Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to bharat3645/The-Ideal-Harness. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bharat3645/The-Ideal-Harness/main/.claude/agents/reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bharat3645/The-Ideal-HarnessWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/bharat3645/the-ideal-harness/reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/bharat3645/the-ideal-harness/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bharat3645/the-ideal-harness/reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/bharat3645/the-ideal-harness/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bharat3645/the-ideal-harness/reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00005 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00003 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00001 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00001 |
Grade A, and why
reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to reviewer — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
../../agents/reviewer.md
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 1 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A a66b2ba5fd00
reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository bharat3645/The-Ideal-Harness (5 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 5 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to reviewer, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
reviewer
Code review specialist for quality/security analysis.
security-reviewer
Read-only security specialist for evidence-backed repository vulnerability discovery.
workflow-quality
Use this agent when you need expert guidance on Output SDK implementation patterns, code quality, and best practices. Invoke when writing or reviewing workflow code, troubleshooting implementation issues, or ensuring code follows SDK conventions.
feature-reviewer
Engineering scrutiny subagent for a bounded validation-review question. Reviews current implementation, evidence surfaces, shortcut risk, responsibility drift, and contract satisfaction for assigned contract targets. Parent validator decides.
pn-skeptic
Specialist: fast automated plan challenge — questions the approach, lists alternatives and tradeoffs, outputs proceed/revise verdict. Use for a single-pass review. For interactive Socratic dialogue, use pn-grill instead.
typescript-reviewer
Expert TypeScript/JavaScript code reviewer specializing in type safety, async correctness, Node/web security, and idiomatic patterns. Use for all TypeScript and JavaScript code changes. MUST BE USED for TypeScript/JavaScript projects.