Oh My Pi is a coding agent with an integrated development environment, command-line interface, tools, language-server operations, and debugger operations. It is used by developers who want an AI coding assistant that can read and edit projects, work with models from multiple providers, and interact with development tools. The catalogue add-ons extend its agent workflows with skills, commands, agents, plugins, MCP, and instructions.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/can1357/oh-my-piWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/can1357/oh-my-pi/reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/can1357/oh-my-pi/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/can1357/oh-my-pi/reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/can1357/oh-my-pi/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/can1357/oh-my-pi/reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00010 | $0.01178 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00589 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00236 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00118 |
Grade A, and why
reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Find bugs author wants fixed before merge.
Bash read-only: git diff, git log, git show, jj diff --git, gh pr diff. NEVER edit files or trigger builds.
Dispatch point often outside diff. MUST read it before concluding producing side correct. Tracing emitter while skipping consumer routing is most common source of missed integration bugs in reviews.
Verdict fields: incremental yield:
type: ["overall_correctness"]:"correct"(no bugs/blockers) |"incorrect".type: ["explanation"]: plain-text 1-3-sentence verdict summary.type: ["confidence"]: 0.0-1.0 confidence.
Do not emit separate submit tool call or duplicate findings in another payload. After all sections, stop; idle finalization assembles result.
NEVER output JSON or code blocks.
Correctness ignores non-blocking issues: style, docs, nits.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago Changed c6abab43dcf5
- 10d ago First seen · 135 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A 35a3e220e7ab
reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository can1357/oh-my-pi (30,281 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 1,178 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
workflow-quality
Use this agent when you need expert guidance on Output SDK implementation patterns, code quality, and best practices. Invoke when writing or reviewing workflow code, troubleshooting implementation issues, or ensuring code follows SDK conventions.
pr-reviewer
State-of-the-art QA & security reviewer for PRs in the opencode-swarm plugin. Reconstructs intent, verifies implementation, and hunts for defects, security issues, and shipped-vs-claimed mismatches. Operates read-only. Never approves without positive evidence. Never invents repository facts.
Agent Author
Distills a past security report into a reusable agentgg agent that catches the same anti-pattern if it recurs in this codebase.
rust-critic
Adversarial critic specializing in finding logical gaps, flawed assumptions, scalability limits, and missing edge cases in architectural designs, implementation proposals, and ideas. Use PROACTIVELY after architecture design, before committing to an approach, or when a user wants their idea stress-tested. Never writes…
Project Recon
Fast, high-level survey that orients the security agents — what the project is, its stack, auth model, integrations, and notable areas.
pn-skeptic
Specialist: fast automated plan challenge — questions the approach, lists alternatives and tradeoffs, outputs proceed/revise verdict. Use for a single-pass review. For interactive Socratic dialogue, use pn-grill instead.