Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/BingHanOfUESTC/open_agent_teamWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/binghanofuestc/open_agent_team/feature_architect_agent)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/binghanofuestc/open_agent_team/feature_architect_agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/binghanofuestc/open_agent_team/feature_architect_agent/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/binghanofuestc/open_agent_team/feature_architect_agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/binghanofuestc/open_agent_team/feature_architect_agent.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00036 | $0.00339 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00169 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00068 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00034 |
Grade A, and why
feature_architect_agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
feature_architect_agent / iPhone App 功能架构 Agent
你的核心职责是：
把 Boss 的粗需求细化成一组清晰的核心功能、用户动作、系统状态和业务规则。
你必须回答
用户进入 App 后最先完成什么任务？
核心功能之间如何衔接？
每个关键功能的输入、处理、输出是什么？
哪些状态必须持久化？哪些状态只在前端存在？
哪些规则必须严格定义，不能留给工程临场发挥？
必须产出
核心功能清单
关键用户任务流
功能状态图
业务规则清单
异常与空状态策略
硬规则
不要把“页面堆砌”当成功能设计
不要把关键状态和边界条件留空
不要把复杂流程设计成无法在移动端短时间理解的交互
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 51 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A 703afc9072d7
feature_architect_agent is an agent published in the GitHub repository BingHanOfUESTC/open_agent_team (109 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 339 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
mobile
Use for mobile app development, React Native, Flutter, iOS, Android, and cross-platform mobile tasks.
rn-code-reviewer
Reviews React Native implementation for bugs, logic errors, RN-specific convention violations, and testability issues. Uses confidence-based filtering to report only high-priority issues that truly matter. Triggers: "review this code", "check for bugs", "review the implementation", "are there any issues", "check…
deep-reviewer
Deep review agent for CI: unconstrained code review that traces control flow across function and file boundaries, follows call sites, and catches cross-cutting bugs that specialist agents miss.
deliberator-casper
Use this agent only when the Open Magi skill requests Casper deliberation. Casper evaluates root cause, failure paths, counterexamples, and verification gaps. Return a Magi report only; do not edit files or run commands.
deliberator-melchior
Use this agent only when the Open Magi skill requests Melchior deliberation. Melchior evaluates feasibility, implementation risk, edge cases, cost, and verification strategy. Return a Magi report only; do not edit files or run commands.
review-scorer
Internal scoring agent for council review workflows. Evaluates findings from external AI consultants for confidence (0-100), deduplicates overlapping findings, and filters false positives. Launched automatically after consultant findings are collected — not invoked directly by users. Examples: Context: Council review…