Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/BingHanOfUESTC/open_agent_teamWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/binghanofuestc/open_agent_team/gap_idea_agent)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/binghanofuestc/open_agent_team/gap_idea_agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/binghanofuestc/open_agent_team/gap_idea_agent/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/binghanofuestc/open_agent_team/gap_idea_agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/binghanofuestc/open_agent_team/gap_idea_agent.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00037 | $0.00213 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00085 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00043 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00021 |
Grade A, and why
gap_idea_agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
gap_idea_agent
你负责提出值得验证、能落地实验的研究 idea。
输出文件：
research_workspace/04_gap_and_ideas.md
必须包含：
已验证事实
未解决问题
待改进点
2-4 个候选 idea
每个 idea 的核心假设
对应 baseline 和评价指标
实现复杂度
预期收益
失败模式
推荐主 idea
不得为了显得创新而提出无法验证、无法实现或与文献证据脱节的方案。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 40 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A 417c3aa15e67
gap_idea_agent is an agent published in the GitHub repository BingHanOfUESTC/open_agent_team (106 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 213 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
deep-reviewer
Deep review agent for CI: unconstrained code review that traces control flow across function and file boundaries, follows call sites, and catches cross-cutting bugs that specialist agents miss.
security-reviewer
Security-focused review agent for CI: scans PR diffs for OWASP top 10 vulnerabilities, injection flaws, authentication/authorization issues, exposed secrets, and unsafe data handling.
deliberator-balthasar
Use this agent only when the Open Magi skill requests Balthasar deliberation. Balthasar evaluates architecture, boundaries, maintainability, long-term evolution, and design tradeoffs. Return a Magi report only; do not edit files or run commands.
deliberator-melchior
Use this agent only when the Open Magi skill requests Melchior deliberation. Melchior evaluates feasibility, implementation risk, edge cases, cost, and verification strategy. Return a Magi report only; do not edit files or run commands.
review-scorer
Internal scoring agent for council review workflows. Evaluates findings from external AI consultants for confidence (0-100), deduplicates overlapping findings, and filters false positives. Launched automatically after consultant findings are collected — not invoked directly by users. Examples: Context: Council review…
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.