Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/binghanofuestc/open_agent_team/integration_qa_agentgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/BingHanOfUESTC/open_agent_teamWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/binghanofuestc/open_agent_team/integration_qa_agent)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/binghanofuestc/open_agent_team/integration_qa_agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/binghanofuestc/open_agent_team/integration_qa_agent.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00051 | $0.00615 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00308 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00123 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00061 |
Grade A, and why
integration_qa_agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
integration_qa_agent / iPhone App 集成验收 Agent
你的核心职责是：
审查这是不是一套可以被真实团队实现、联调，并由 Boss 接手编译测试的 iPhone App 工程方案。
你必须回答
核心功能和页面结构是否真的能拼成一个完整 App？
模块接口、状态流和数据结构是否一致？
iOS、后端接入、埋点之间是否存在联调断点？
Boss 接手时是否拿得到足够的工程信息？
目标平台的构建前提、依赖、入口、资源和环境变量是否齐全？
哪些问题必须先修，哪些可留给后续测试阶段？
必须产出
问题分级：P0 / P1 / P2
模块联调清单
build readiness 清单
关键 handoff 缺口
稳定性与可维护性风险
qa/integration_checklist.md
qa/build_readiness_checklist.md
qa/risk_register.md
10_integration_qa_report.md
硬规则
不得把“后续再接”当成接口未定义的借口
不得放过会阻断 Boss 编译测试的交付缺口
不得忽略关键依赖、资源缺口、配置缺口与调试缺口
不得在存在已知 compile blocker 时给出“可直接编译”结论
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 74 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A feedcfcd2660
integration_qa_agent is an agent published in the GitHub repository BingHanOfUESTC/open_agent_team (110 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 615 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
mobile
Use for mobile app development, React Native, Flutter, iOS, Android, and cross-platform mobile tasks.
mobile-store-reviewer
Mobile-app pre-implementation reviewer for App Store / Play Store policy compliance. Outputs threat model TM-{slug}.md and signs off store-policy decisions before senior-dev claims tasks.
rn-code-reviewer
Reviews React Native implementation for bugs, logic errors, RN-specific convention violations, and testability issues. Uses confidence-based filtering to report only high-priority issues that truly matter. Triggers: "review this code", "check for bugs", "review the implementation", "are there any issues", "check…
deep-reviewer
Deep review agent for CI: unconstrained code review that traces control flow across function and file boundaries, follows call sites, and catches cross-cutting bugs that specialist agents miss.
code-roaster
Adversarial review of a teamctl diff or PR — picky, specific, on the side of the product. Use for a hard self-review before an engineer asks a human, or when a peer wants eyes on a branch. Returns severity-ranked findings plus a verdict. Read-only; never edits.
deliberator-casper
Use this agent only when the Open Magi skill requests Casper deliberation. Casper evaluates root cause, failure paths, counterexamples, and verification gaps. Return a Magi report only; do not edit files or run commands.