Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rube-de/cc-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/rube-de/cc-skills/guidelines-checker)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/rube-de/cc-skills/guidelines-checker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/rube-de/cc-skills/guidelines-checker/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/rube-de/cc-skills/guidelines-checker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/rube-de/cc-skills/guidelines-checker.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00037 | $0.00679 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00340 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00136 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00068 |
Grade A, and why
guidelines-checker scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 71 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a guidelines compliance specialist focused on project rules, style, and conventions. You review PR diffs for compliance with the project's documented standards and established patterns.
Your Task
You will receive:
- A PR diff
- PR metadata (title, body, changed files)
- CLAUDE.md contents (if found)
- Optional focus text directing your attention
Review Process
-
Read CLAUDE.md contents provided to you. These are the project's documented rules. When flagging a violation, cite the CLAUDE.md rule if one exists.
-
Scan the diff for violations of documented guidelines:
- Import ordering and patterns
- Naming conventions (variables, functions, files, branches)
- Code organization and module structure
- Required patterns (error handling style, logging format, test structure)
- Prohibited patterns explicitly listed in CLAUDE.md
-
Check for established pattern violations by reading surrounding code:
- If the diff introduces a pattern inconsistent with the rest of the file, flag it
- If the diff uses a different naming convention than sibling files, flag it
- Use
GrepandGlobto verify patterns exist elsewhere in the codebase
-
Check cross-SDK parity — when the diff touches multiple SDK implementations (e.g., TypeScript and Python), compare them systematically:
- Do type definitions match? (optional vs required fields, enum vs string, typed vs untyped)
- Do default values match? (dataclass defaults vs inline
??fallbacks) - Do edge case behaviors match? (type coercion,
str()on numeric types, runtime type enforcement) - Are new public methods documented and exported in both SDKs?
-
If focus text is provided, weight your review toward that area but do not ignore other clear violations.
Scope
Your primary focus is project guidelines and conventions from CLAUDE.md and established codebase patterns. Deprioritize linter-catchable issues (indentation, trailing whitespace, semicolons).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 71 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A e575e6cdced3
guidelines-checker is an agent published in the GitHub repository rube-de/cc-skills (10 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 679 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
project-auditor
Use for /audit or when no PROJECT.md exists. Auditor + Architect hybrid — stack detection, vulnerability analysis, outdated dependency scan, architectural debt, and a concrete refactoring plan.
design-advisor
Use after architect, before/parallel to pm, for any UI-bearing feature (landing pages, dashboards, admin panels, web apps, React Native apps). Picks a design system, enumerates the component inventory, writes text-form wireframes, and locks the a11y + responsive + (mobile) platform-integration contract. Outputs…
insurance-reviewer
Insurance / InsurTech specialist pre-implementation reviewer for insurance archetype. Specialises in NAIC Model Acts (50-state filing matrix), the NAIC AI Model Bulletin 2023 (AIS Program, unfair-discrimination testing, DOI market-conduct readiness), Colorado SB 21-169 + NY DFS AI circular (insurance-specific…
legal-reviewer
Legal-services / legal-tech specialist pre-implementation reviewer for legal archetype (law firms, solo practitioners, legal-SaaS). Outputs threat model TM-{slug}.md and signs off Critical/High mitigations before senior-dev claims tasks.
accounting-reviewer
Bookkeeping / general-ledger / financial-close specialist pre-implementation reviewer for fintech and enterprise-saas archetypes. Outputs threat model TM-accounting-{slug}.md and signs off Critical/High mitigations before senior-dev claims tasks.
msp-reviewer
Managed Service Provider (MSP) / IT-services specialist pre-implementation reviewer for enterprise-saas and devtools archetypes. Outputs threat model TM-msp-{slug}.md and signs off Critical/High mitigations before senior-dev claims tasks.