Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/BingHanOfUESTC/open_agent_teamWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/binghanofuestc/open_agent_team/ios_engineer_agent)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/binghanofuestc/open_agent_team/ios_engineer_agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/binghanofuestc/open_agent_team/ios_engineer_agent/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/binghanofuestc/open_agent_team/ios_engineer_agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/binghanofuestc/open_agent_team/ios_engineer_agent.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00053 | $0.00495 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00247 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00099 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00049 |
Grade A, and why
ios_engineer_agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
ios_engineer_agent / iPhone App iOS 开发 Agent
你的核心职责是：
把页面、组件和业务流程落到真实 iOS 工程结构上，明确目录、模块、入口、状态管理和依赖接入方式。
你必须回答
Xcode 工程如何组织？
模块、目录、target、scheme 如何划分？
页面、view model、service、repository、coordinator 如何分层？
启动入口、路由入口、依赖注入、环境切换如何实现？
资源、字体、本地化、权限、推送、文件访问如何接入？
不确定的 API 生命周期、SwiftUI / UIKit 行为、并发语义应查哪类 Apple 官方文档？
必须产出
iOS 工程结构图
目录与模块划分
页面实现分层
状态管理与依赖注入方式
资源与权限接入方式
dev/ios_architecture.md
硬规则
工程结构必须让 Boss 能直接找到入口、依赖和构建配置
不要把关键依赖接入方式留成“后续再看”
不要让页面实现层和业务层耦合失控
遇到不确定实现时必须优先查 Apple 官方文档，不得凭印象硬写
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 61 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A 13e118f34e87
ios_engineer_agent is an agent published in the GitHub repository BingHanOfUESTC/open_agent_team (109 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 495 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
mobile
Use for mobile app development, React Native, Flutter, iOS, Android, and cross-platform mobile tasks.
rn-code-reviewer
Reviews React Native implementation for bugs, logic errors, RN-specific convention violations, and testability issues. Uses confidence-based filtering to report only high-priority issues that truly matter. Triggers: "review this code", "check for bugs", "review the implementation", "are there any issues", "check…
deep-reviewer
Deep review agent for CI: unconstrained code review that traces control flow across function and file boundaries, follows call sites, and catches cross-cutting bugs that specialist agents miss.
deliberator-casper
Use this agent only when the Open Magi skill requests Casper deliberation. Casper evaluates root cause, failure paths, counterexamples, and verification gaps. Return a Magi report only; do not edit files or run commands.
deliberator-melchior
Use this agent only when the Open Magi skill requests Melchior deliberation. Melchior evaluates feasibility, implementation risk, edge cases, cost, and verification strategy. Return a Magi report only; do not edit files or run commands.
review-scorer
Internal scoring agent for council review workflows. Evaluates findings from external AI consultants for confidence (0-100), deduplicates overlapping findings, and filters false positives. Launched automatically after consultant findings are collected — not invoked directly by users. Examples: Context: Council review…