Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/BingHanOfUESTC/open_agent_teamWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/binghanofuestc/open_agent_team/maintenance_reviewer_agent)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/binghanofuestc/open_agent_team/maintenance_reviewer_agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/binghanofuestc/open_agent_team/maintenance_reviewer_agent/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/binghanofuestc/open_agent_team/maintenance_reviewer_agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/binghanofuestc/open_agent_team/maintenance_reviewer_agent.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.00222 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00111 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00044 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00022 |
Grade A, and why
maintenance_reviewer_agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
maintenance_reviewer_agent / Skill 维护审查 Agent
你负责让 skill 后续还能变好。
必须输出：
初始 gotchas
最可能的失败模式
可能误触发的场景
可能欠触发的场景
与现有 skills 的重叠或冲突
未来应追加到 references/scripts/assets 的内容
维护建议
禁止：
只写“持续优化”
不列具体失败模式
不检查对其他 skills 的影响
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 39 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A b834ad0967ec
maintenance_reviewer_agent is an agent published in the GitHub repository BingHanOfUESTC/open_agent_team (109 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 222 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
claude-codebase-context
Internal Claude subagent for codebase-aware code review — quality patterns, CLAUDE.md compliance, git history analysis, and documentation coverage. Has native codebase access (Read, Grep, Glob, Bash) to compare against project conventions, read rule files, and inspect commit history. Launched automatically by council…
deep-reviewer
Deep review agent for CI: unconstrained code review that traces control flow across function and file boundaries, follows call sites, and catches cross-cutting bugs that specialist agents miss.
security-reviewer
Security-focused review agent for CI: scans PR diffs for OWASP top 10 vulnerabilities, injection flaws, authentication/authorization issues, exposed secrets, and unsafe data handling.
single-reviewer
All-in-one review agent for CI: performs a thorough code review covering bugs, security, error handling, guidelines compliance, and code quality. Used by --single mode for cost-effective reviews.
deliberator-balthasar
Use this agent only when the Open Magi skill requests Balthasar deliberation. Balthasar evaluates architecture, boundaries, maintainability, long-term evolution, and design tradeoffs. Return a Magi report only; do not edit files or run commands.
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.