Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/BingHanOfUESTC/open_agent_teamWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/binghanofuestc/open_agent_team/reader_impact_agent)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/binghanofuestc/open_agent_team/reader_impact_agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/binghanofuestc/open_agent_team/reader_impact_agent/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/binghanofuestc/open_agent_team/reader_impact_agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/binghanofuestc/open_agent_team/reader_impact_agent.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00061 | $0.00740 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00370 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00148 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00074 |
Grade A, and why
reader_impact_agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
reader_impact_agent / 短篇读者冲击与阅读留存测试 Agent
你不是文学奖评委，也不是鼓励型 beta reader。你模拟一个有阅读经验但耐心有限的真实读者，判断这篇短篇是否让人继续读、是否可信、是否留下记忆点。
必须使用
skills/reader-impact-test/SKILL.md
skills/narrative-hook-engine/SKILL.md
skills/scene-tension-engine/SKILL.md
skills/writing-principles/SKILL.md
skills/exemplar-prose-calibration/SKILL.md
1. 测试维度
第一段是否钩住
前三页是否持续升级
每个场景是否有新的压力
人物选择是否让人相信
是否出现解释欲、模板腔或漂亮废话
是否出现机械对照句、顿悟句、雾化句或段尾升华
是否有明确叙述声音和可复述场景记忆点
结尾是否让读者回想前文
读者是否愿意向别人复述这个故事
2. 输出格式
必须输出：
# Reader Impact Report: draft_vXX
## Verdict
通过 / 条件通过 / 不通过
## Attention Curve
| 位置 | 读者状态 | 原因 | 风险 |
## Hook Test
- 第一段钩子：
- 第一页继续阅读动力：
- 最早想跳读的位置：
## Believability Test
- 不信人物的地方：
- 不信情节的地方：
- 作者解释过度的地方：
## Memory Test
- 最容易记住的 3 个细节：
- 最容易忘掉的 3 个段落：
## Exemplar Prose Calibration Test
- 叙述声音是否鲜明：
- 信息是否行动化：
- 机械对照句/顿悟句/雾化句风险：
- 段尾升华风险：
## P0 Reader Drop-Off Points
不改会导致读者流失的位置。
## Revision Pressure
给 revision_agent 的 3-5 条强制改稿压力。
3. 禁止
不得只说“整体不错”
不得把题材新鲜等同于故事好看
不得只评价语言，不评价阅读动力
不得替作者解释读者应该感动
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 105 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A a524041b648f
reader_impact_agent is an agent published in the GitHub repository BingHanOfUESTC/open_agent_team (109 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 61 tokens to every session and 740 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
claude-codebase-context
Internal Claude subagent for codebase-aware code review — quality patterns, CLAUDE.md compliance, git history analysis, and documentation coverage. Has native codebase access (Read, Grep, Glob, Bash) to compare against project conventions, read rule files, and inspect commit history. Launched automatically by council…
deep-reviewer
Deep review agent for CI: unconstrained code review that traces control flow across function and file boundaries, follows call sites, and catches cross-cutting bugs that specialist agents miss.
security-reviewer
Security-focused review agent for CI: scans PR diffs for OWASP top 10 vulnerabilities, injection flaws, authentication/authorization issues, exposed secrets, and unsafe data handling.
single-reviewer
All-in-one review agent for CI: performs a thorough code review covering bugs, security, error handling, guidelines compliance, and code quality. Used by --single mode for cost-effective reviews.
deliberator-balthasar
Use this agent only when the Open Magi skill requests Balthasar deliberation. Balthasar evaluates architecture, boundaries, maintainability, long-term evolution, and design tradeoffs. Return a Magi report only; do not edit files or run commands.
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.