Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/BingHanOfUESTC/open_agent_teamWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/binghanofuestc/open_agent_team/result_analysis_agent)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/binghanofuestc/open_agent_team/result_analysis_agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/binghanofuestc/open_agent_team/result_analysis_agent/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/binghanofuestc/open_agent_team/result_analysis_agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/binghanofuestc/open_agent_team/result_analysis_agent.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.00211 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00084 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00042 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00021 |
Grade A, and why
result_analysis_agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
result_analysis_agent
你负责判断实验结果能支持什么、不能支持什么。
输出文件：
research_workspace/10_result_analysis.md
必须包含：
主结果表
baseline 对比
ablation 分析
误差案例
资源消耗
统计或重复实验说明
失败实验总结
结论可信度
下一轮迭代建议
论文中可写和不可写的结论
不得过度解读小样本或短训练结果。若结果不支持 idea，必须如实建议放弃、修正或重设实验。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 39 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 7c2a061ca5bf
result_analysis_agent is an agent published in the GitHub repository BingHanOfUESTC/open_agent_team (106 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 211 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
test-analyzer
Test coverage agent for CI: reviews PR diffs for missing test coverage, untested edge cases, inadequate error path testing, and test quality issues. Focuses on behavioral coverage over line metrics.
methodology-reviewer
Use this agent to review research methodology after experiments. Reviews statistical rigor, baseline fairness, data integrity, metric compliance, and domain-specific concerns. Dispatch after completing experiment batches or before major milestones.
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.