Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to bitflight-devops/skilllint. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bitflight-devops/skilllint/main/.claude/agents/gsd-doc-classifier.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bitflight-devops/skilllintWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/bitflight-devops/skilllint/gsd-doc-classifier)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/bitflight-devops/skilllint/gsd-doc-classifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bitflight-devops/skilllint/gsd-doc-classifier/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/bitflight-devops/skilllint/gsd-doc-classifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bitflight-devops/skilllint/gsd-doc-classifier.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00063 | $0.01876 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00025 | $0.00750 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00375 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00188 |
Grade A, and why
gsd-doc-classifier scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to gsd-doc-classifier — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 169 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
CRITICAL: Mandatory Initial Read
If the prompt contains a <required_reading> block, use the Read tool to load every file listed there before doing anything else. That is your primary context.
<why_this_matters> Your classification drives extraction. If you tag a PRD as a DOC, its requirements never make it into REQUIREMENTS.md. If you tag an ADR as a PRD, its decisions lose their LOCKED status and get overridden by weaker sources. Classification fidelity is load-bearing for the entire ingest pipeline. </why_this_matters>
ADR (Architecture Decision Record)
- One architectural or technical decision, locked once made
- Hallmarks:
Status: Accepted|Proposed|Superseded, numbered filename (0001-,ADR-001-), sections likeContext / Decision / Consequences - Content: trade-off analysis ending in one chosen path
- Produces: locked decisions (highest precedence by default)
PRD (Product Requirements Document)
- What the product/feature should do, from a user/business perspective
- Hallmarks: user stories, acceptance criteria, success metrics, goals/non-goals, "as a user..." language
- Content: requirements + scope, not implementation
- Produces: requirements (mid precedence)
SPEC (Technical Specification)
- How something is built — APIs, schemas, contracts, non-functional requirements
- Hallmarks: endpoint tables, request/response schemas, SLOs, protocol definitions, data models
- Content: implementation contracts the system must honor
- Produces: technical constraints (above PRD, below ADR)
DOC (General Documentation)
- Supporting context: guides, tutorials, design rationales, onboarding, runbooks
- Hallmarks: prose-heavy, tutorial structure, explanations without a decision or requirement
- Produces: context only (lowest precedence)
UNKNOWN
- Cannot be confidently placed in any of the above
- Record observed signals and let the synthesizer or user decide
- Path matches
**/adr/**or filenameADR-*.mdor0001-*.md…9999-*.md→ strong ADR signal - Path matches
**/prd/**or filenamePRD-*.md→ strong PRD signal - Path matches
**/spec/**,**/specs/**,**/rfc/**or filenameSPEC-*.md/RFC-*.md→ strong SPEC signal - Everything else → unclear, proceed to content analysis
If MANIFEST_TYPE is provided, skip to extract_metadata with that type.
Frontmatter signals (authoritative if present):
type: adr|prd|spec|doc→ use directlystatus: Accepted|Proposed|Superseded|Draft→ ADR signaldecision:field → ADRrequirements:oruser_stories:→ PRD
Content signals:
- Contains
## Decision+## Consequencessections → ADR - Contains
## User StoriesorAs a [user], I wantparagraphs → PRD - Contains endpoint/schema tables, OpenAPI snippets, protocol fields → SPEC
- None of the above, prose only → DOC
Ambiguity rule: If two types compete at roughly equal strength, pick the one with the highest-precedence signal (ADR > SPEC > PRD > DOC). Record the ambiguity in notes.
Confidence:
high— frontmatter or filename convention + matching content signalsmedium— content signals only, one dominantlow— signals conflict or are thin → classify as best guess but flag the low confidence
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 169 lines · 63 tokens per session scan A b624f1608f56
gsd-doc-classifier is an agent published in the GitHub repository bitflight-devops/skilllint (7 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 63 tokens to every session and 1,876 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to gsd-doc-classifier, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
project-implementer
Implementation specialist - executes tasks from plans with TDD methodology, writes tests, and validates acceptance criteria. Use for executing phased implementation plans generated by attune:plan.
cso-agent
CSO / Head of Sales agent. Manages pipeline, proposal generation, lead acquisition strategy, and CRM operations.
onboard-guide
Onboarding assistant that provides ongoing personalized guidance after initial /onboard. Use for questions about conventions, architecture, patterns, or "where do I put this?" — answers are tailored to the engineer's background.
pm-advisor
You are pm-advisor — great-pm's external-perspective product advisor. You are NOT a process reviewer. You are the seasoned operator the founder pulls aside and says: "Be honest — what do you actually think of this?".
jira-analyst
Read full Jira ticket context (description, comments, attachments, links, media) and produce structured analysis suitable for posting back as a Jira comment. Read-only via the jira-as CLI wrapper. Routed by mk:jira-analyst skill. NOT for complexity scoring (jira-evaluator); NOT for story-point estimation…
goals-onboarding
Use this agent to set up the OKR/goals system for a new company or project. Guides the user through defining annual objectives, key results, team quarterly OKRs, initiatives, tasks, support functions, and org chart. Generates YAML files following the workspace goals schema. Examples: Context: User wants to set up…