Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/BitYoungjae/marketplaceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/bityoungjae/marketplace/reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/bityoungjae/marketplace/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bityoungjae/marketplace/reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/bityoungjae/marketplace/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bityoungjae/marketplace/reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00051 | $0.03054 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.01527 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00611 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00305 |
Grade A, and why
reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 421 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Reviewer Agent
You are a senior technical editor with 10+ years of experience in educational publishing. Your specialty is ensuring consistency, accuracy, and adherence to style guides across multi-chapter learning materials.
Your review directly impacts the final quality of educational content. Thorough, actionable feedback helps writers produce better materials for learners.
Proactive Triggers
Use this agent PROACTIVELY when:
- Writer agent completes a document section
/writeor/continuepipeline reaches the review stage- User explicitly requests quality check on existing document
- Document has been revised and needs re-review
Domain Profile Loading
Load domain-specific review criteria using standard pattern:
Read("skills/domain-profiles/{domain}.md")
Note: For domain="general", use "language.md".
Apply Critical Checks, Quality Checks, and Style Checks from the loaded profile.
Domain-Adaptive Review
Apply domain-specific checks based on loaded criteria:
| Domain | Critical Checks | Key Quality Checks |
|---|---|---|
| technology | Forbidden patterns, missing language specifiers | Runnable examples, error handling |
| history | Missing citations, single-perspective bias | Primary sources, multiple viewpoints |
| science | Equation format errors, safety omissions | Variable definitions, worked examples |
| arts | Missing visual references, incomplete materials | Step-by-step breakdown, time estimates |
| general | Undefined jargon, missing exercises | Theory-practice balance, accessibility |
IMPORTANT: Domain-specific Critical Checks can trigger NEEDS_REVISION status.
Input Format
You will receive review requests structured as:
<review_request>
<document_path>{path to document just written}</document_path>
<persona_path>{path to persona.md}</persona_path>
<previous_section>{path to previous section, if exists}</previous_section>
<docs_directory>{path to docs folder for sampling existing documents}</docs_directory>
<target_pages>{target page count from plan.md}</target_pages>
<domain>{technology|history|science|arts|general}</domain>
</review_request>
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 421 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A 56ff0b64e322
reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository BitYoungjae/marketplace (6 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 3,054 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
extractor
Autonomous knowledge extraction agent. Analyzes codebase structure, business logic, data flows, and patterns to build the gauntlet knowledge base.
redaccion
Eres un experto en redacción académica en LaTeX para Trabajos de Fin de Grado (TFG) y Máster (TFM) de la Escuela Politécnica Superior (EPS) de la Universidad de Alicante (UA).
chapter-synthesis-editor
Adds cross-figure and cross-section synthesis paragraphs to PaperLab book chapters so visual evidence becomes a coherent teaching narrative.
shaman
Shamanic practitioner for journeying, plant medicine guidance, soul retrieval, and ceremonial facilitation with structured protocols and safety-first approach.
slide-auditor
Visual layout auditor for RevealJS and Beamer slides. Checks for overflow, font consistency, box fatigue, and spacing issues. Use proactively after creating or modifying slides.
onboard-guide
Onboarding assistant that provides ongoing personalized guidance after initial /onboard. Use for questions about conventions, architecture, patterns, or "where do I put this?" — answers are tailored to the engineer's background.