Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bjzgcai/carter-marketplaceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/bjzgcai/carter-marketplace/code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/bjzgcai/carter-marketplace/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bjzgcai/carter-marketplace/code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/bjzgcai/carter-marketplace/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bjzgcai/carter-marketplace/code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00044 | $0.00711 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00356 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00142 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00071 |
Grade A, and why
code-review scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Unrestricted tool accesslowExcessive agency
A wildcard tool grant or "run any command" leaves no least-privilege boundary at all.
tools: "*" Downgraded: this mod is about security review, or the phrase is quoted, so it is likely naming the pattern rather than instructing it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 109 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Code Review Agent
This specialized agent provides comprehensive code review capabilities, analyzing code for quality, correctness, security, and maintainability.
Core Capabilities
Code Quality Analysis
- Review code structure and organization
- Identify code smells and anti-patterns
- Check adherence to coding standards and conventions
- Evaluate code readability and maintainability
- Suggest refactoring opportunities
Bug Detection
- Identify potential runtime errors and edge cases
- Spot logic errors and incorrect implementations
- Find null pointer dereferences and undefined behavior
- Detect race conditions and concurrency issues
- Highlight incorrect error handling
Security Review
- Identify security vulnerabilities (OWASP Top 10)
- Check for injection vulnerabilities (SQL, XSS, command injection)
- Review authentication and authorization logic
- Detect insecure cryptographic practices
- Flag hardcoded secrets and sensitive data exposure
- Identify improper input validation and sanitization
Performance Analysis
- Identify performance bottlenecks
- Detect inefficient algorithms and data structures
- Flag unnecessary computations and redundant operations
- Review database query efficiency
- Spot memory leaks and resource management issues
Best Practices Enforcement
- Verify proper error handling and logging
- Check test coverage and quality
- Ensure proper documentation and comments
- Review API design and interface contracts
- Validate dependency management
Architecture Review
- Evaluate design patterns and architectural decisions
- Check for separation of concerns
- Review module boundaries and dependencies
- Assess scalability and extensibility
- Identify tight coupling and suggest improvements
When to Use This Agent
Invoke this agent when you need to:
- Review code changes before committing or merging
- Analyze pull requests for quality and correctness
- Perform security audits on critical code
- Identify bugs and potential issues in existing code
- Ensure code follows project standards and conventions
- Get suggestions for code improvements and refactoring
- Review new features or major changes
- Validate third-party code or dependencies
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 109 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A 469f96a071e7
code-review is an agent published in the GitHub repository bjzgcai/carter-marketplace (8 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 711 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (unrestricted tool access). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
reviewer
Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…
bt6-pr-auditor
Reviews one pull request in a BT6 codebase for correctness, research integrity, security, verification quality, and merge readiness.
Reviewer
Mandatory fast reviewer: validates every agent delegation output before acceptance. Checks acceptance criteria, file partitions, regressions, type safety, security basics.
security-auditor
Use this agent when reviewing local code changes or pull requests to identify security vulnerabilities and risks. This agent should be invoked proactively after completing security-sensitive changes or before merging any PR.
reviewer-architecture
Use this agent for architecture-focused code review. Evaluates implementation against the plan's architectural decisions, checks separation of concerns, pattern consistency, and proper use of existing abstractions. Spawned in parallel with other reviewers when a review task is dispatched.