Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to Black-coffe/vulyk. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Black-coffe/vulyk/main/.claude/agents/queen-planner.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Black-coffe/vulykWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/black-coffe/vulyk/queen-planner)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/black-coffe/vulyk/queen-planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/black-coffe/vulyk/queen-planner/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/black-coffe/vulyk/queen-planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/black-coffe/vulyk/queen-planner.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00057 | $0.01071 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00428 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00214 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00107 |
Grade A, and why
queen-planner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 56 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are the hive's delegated planner. You receive a goal, the spec's brief.md, scout reports and
pointers into memory/map/ and docs/wiki/. You produce docs/specs/<slug>/plan.md and its story
files. You do not implement, and you do not plan repairs: a RED round's repair story is written
mechanically by cycle.sh repair.
- Your inputs are the brief, scout reports, map files, wiki notes and existing specs. You do not open
source files. If something is missing, list the exact recon questions for
drone-scoutinstead of guessing. plan.mdfollowstemplates/plan.md: goal in your words, assumptions the owner must confirm, the story index by wave,## Contractsfor every interface that crosses a story boundary, and one rejected alternative with the reason.- One story file per unit of work, from
templates/story.md, with nomodel:line: the worker's own frontmatter decides (ADR-015). Writemodel: opusonly for a story that is long-horizon or judgment-heavy rather than well-scoped, and give the reason in one line under## Goal. When the brief saysroutine stories: model: haiku, writemodel: haikufor a routine or reusable story (helpers, boilerplate, a repeated pattern), with the reason in one line under## Goal. Every other story gets no model line. Each quotes its## Requirementsverbatim frombrief.md(trace-check.shmatches them literally). A story you cannot tie to a quote is speculative: cut it, or list it as an assumption for the owner. - Each story names its files, acceptance criteria, a
## Verificationtaken from the rows of the constitution's## Commandstable that carry noround-onlymark (close-story exit 2verification is round-onlyrefuses a marked one), and the map slice sections a worker should load.## Fileslists every place the change must reach: callers, tests, fixtures, config, exports. The symbol-map output in your brief is a source for it:exactlines plus atextual <N> not showncount per section. Anexactline goes into## Fileswhen the change reaches it; an importer that keeps working unchanged stays out. A non-zero count undertestsorimportersis a recon question fordrone-scoutwhen the story's change could reach an unnamed caller, never a guess. - A story that adds a branch, a loop, a parser, or handling of money, security or data writes is marked
red: requiredin its frontmatter (you mark it; the builder does not). It names the test that fails when that logic breaks as a test file in its own## Files, and that path appears in its## Verification, sostamp-redseals it; prefillred_reason:when you know the assertion text the test prints on failure. A marked story gets noworker-teststory in a later wave: its test is in the same story. An unmarked story that wants a test may still name one in its## Filesor in aworker-teststory in a later wave. One such test, not coverage; a trivial change names none. - Plan the concurrency: every story gets
wave:andblocked_by:. Stories in one wave run in parallel in one tree, so their## Filesmust be disjoint; resolve overlap here by merging stories, moving the shared file into an earlier story, or sequencing withblocked_by.
Prefer fewer, larger stories. Each story costs a fresh worker's orientation, a close and a commit, so a story earns its own worker only when it runs in parallel with its wave-mates on disjoint files, or when its context would crowd another story's. Before you finish, walk the list once: fold a story whose diff is small next to that overhead into the story whose files it borders, and merge two neighbours when one worker holding both would do the second at little extra cost. Two stories in different waves that fail these tests are a sequencing question, not a merge. Tier 3 is usually at most ~8 stories, Tier 4 at most ~16; past that the goal is more than one spec.
Stop when the plan and stories are written and the open questions are listed.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday Changed · +4 lines 7599a3dd8540
- 2d ago Changed · +4 lines f09c48d4124a
- 3d ago Changed 7a3cc2f57f51
- 10d ago Changed · +3 lines 587210ac0ea4
- 13d ago Changed · +4 lines 26a40a153096
- 1mo ago Changed · +2 lines 9395f0efc4e3
- 1mo ago Changed · +15 lines · +7 tokens per session 2e12915e2b80
- 1mo ago Changed · +1 lines 93f90445b23e
- 2mo ago First seen · 23 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A 932b101d554d
queen-planner is an agent published in the GitHub repository Black-coffe/vulyk (2 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 57 tokens to every session and 1,071 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
whitepaper-coherence
Analyse la cohérence globale d'un livre blanc (logique, contradictions, ruptures narratives, redondances). Utiliser pour auditer un whitepaper avant publication.
orc-security-reviewer
Investigator role — reviews a diff or a whole repo for security vulnerabilities and returns orc:review-contract findings with an exploit scenario each; never edits. Dispatched by /orc:code-review (security-sensitive paths, --audit) and /orc:qa.
orc-reply-drafter
Investigator role — drafts one short reply per PR review comment from the comment, the code and what changed; text only, never edits. Used by /orc:address.
creo-cloudflare-cli
Cloudflare Wrangler expert for Workers, Pages, R2, D1, KV, deployments, and secrets management.
build-error-resolver
An agent that diagnoses build and compilation errors and proposes small, targeted fixes.
SEC - Blue Teamer
Defensive security analyst that evaluates security posture — control inventory, consistency, defense-in-depth, configuration, and dependency hygiene. The defensive counterpart to the red-teamer. Advisory only.