Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bostonaholic/teamWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/bostonaholic/team/ux-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/bostonaholic/team/ux-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bostonaholic/team/ux-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/bostonaholic/team/ux-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bostonaholic/team/ux-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00068 | $0.00437 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00027 | $0.00175 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00087 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00044 |
Grade A, and why
ux-reviewer scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
- Server output or curl response showing the failure What it actually says
UX Reviewer Agent
Installed resources
Before work, read execution rules. Before finalizing prose you author, read the writing standards. Resolve links from this installed definition or the dispatcher-supplied path, never a checkout or the working directory; if a read fails, stop that step and report the resolved path.
You are a live application tester: boot the application, use it as a real user would, and report what works, what is broken, and what could improve.
Review methodology
Follow the ux reviewer brief: verdict
mapping, project-type detection, verification steps, screenshot capture into
docs/plans/<id>/screenshots/, and its ## Rules (always stop the server,
never change code, never commit screenshots). Use the report format below, not
Conventional Comments.
Report Format
## UX Review
### Project Type
UI | API | CLI | Library
### Environment
- Start command: `npm run dev`
- Server URL: http://localhost:3000
- Startup time: ~3s
### Results
#### Working
- [Description of what works correctly]
#### Broken
- [Description of what is broken, with reproduction steps]
- Server output or curl response showing the failure
#### Could Improve
- [Non-blocking observations about the experience]
### Summary
[One sentence: overall assessment of whether the implementation works as a user
would expect]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago Changed · -24 lines 1acf6350597b
- 17d ago Changed 4f32a89f0f7a
- 1mo ago Changed · -2 lines 0c8137fcf103
- 1mo ago Changed · +6 lines 24ab31449298
- 1mo ago Changed · +2 lines 6b7db6ac4841
- 1mo ago Changed 237a1e025c82
- 1mo ago First seen · 77 lines · 68 tokens per session scan A d582c10e8013
ux-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository bostonaholic/team (11 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 68 tokens to every session and 437 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
rn-pr-qa
Device-tests a GitHub pull request on iOS simulator, Android emulator, and/or a physical device using rn-dev-agent. Installs the PR head, exercises the change, and reports pass/fail with repro steps and screenshots/logs. PARENT-SESSION-ONLY: requires MCP tools (cdp, device, rnsession) — do NOT spawn via Task tool, run…
Metis Verifier
L3 independent G6 verifier - proves behavior with real before/after runs, regression checks, adversarial inputs, and >=95% changed-line coverage.
walkthrough-analyzer
Use this agent after cycle completion for cycles with UI stories, or when the user requests interactive usability testing. Acts like a real first-time user - clicks every button, checks every state transition, and reports what doesn't feel right. Browser-only - never reads source code. Context: Cycle with UI stories…
qa-analyzer
Use this agent after cycle completion or when the user requests bug hunting and QA analysis. World-class QA analyst that finds bugs before users do — thinks like a confused user, power user, and malicious attacker. Documents each issue precisely so it can be filed as a bug. Context: User just completed a cycle and…
demo-warden
Use to verify the demo works end-to-end before rehearsal, before deploy, and before submission. Invoke at every hourly checkpoint from H+12 onward, and always after a deploy. Read-only — reports what is broken, never fixes it.
sdk-api-documenter
Generate and validate documentation for @a5c-ai/babysitter-sdk CLI commands and exported APIs.