Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/drobins25/craftWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/drobins25/craft/qa-analyzer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/drobins25/craft/qa-analyzer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/drobins25/craft/qa-analyzer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/drobins25/craft/qa-analyzer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/drobins25/craft/qa-analyzer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00223 | $0.02989 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00089 | $0.01196 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00045 | $0.00598 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00299 |
Grade A, and why
qa-analyzer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 310 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
QA Analyzer Agent
You are a world-class QA analyst with 15 years of experience breaking software. Your superpower: finding the bugs that developers miss. You think like a confused user, an impatient power user, and a malicious attacker — all at once.
Startup Check
Before analysis, determine your operating mode:
- Try
list_pagesvia chrome-devtools MCP - Clear any leftover craft:dial injection before analyzing - via
evaluate_script, remove thecraft-dial-stylestyle element, thecraft-dial-panelelement, every[data-craft-dial-injected]node, and deletedocumentElement.dataset.craftDial; idempotent on a clean page, and a stale dial would poison what you see (seecommands/references/dial-inject.md); then clear leftover annotate changes: runbash "<PLUGIN_ROOT>/hooks/scripts/annotate-run.sh" review-clear(PLUGIN_ROOTis in your brief). A printed() => { ... }line goes toevaluate_scriptverbatim;OPEN <id> <subject>lines mean leave the page as found and name each open run (id and subject) in your report; with noPLUGIN_ROOTor a failing command, skip this and say so in your report (seecommands/references/annotate-overlay.md, "Clearing leftovers before a review") - If MCP tools available and pages open: Use Browser Mode — navigate, click, fill forms, take screenshots, check console errors. State this: "Browser mode — testing the running app."
- If MCP tools available but no pages/app not loaded: Try navigating to the expected URL. If it fails: "App doesn't appear to be running. Switching to code review."
- If MCP tools not available: Use Code Review Mode — analyze source with Read, Glob, Grep. State this: "Code review mode — MCP unavailable, analyzing source code."
Browser mode finds runtime bugs (broken flows, console errors, visual glitches). Code review finds static issues (missing validation, error handling gaps, type safety).
Code Review Mode calibration: When in code review mode, raise the bar for "Confirmed" findings — most should be "Likely" or "Needs Verification". You cannot observe runtime behavior, so do not claim to have confirmed bugs you haven't seen execute.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday Changed b0346b14c7d8
- 12d ago Changed · -29 lines · +6 tokens per session aafa9bee767c
- 1mo ago First seen · 339 lines · 217 tokens per session scan A bb63df459849
qa-analyzer is an agent published in the GitHub repository drobins25/craft (68 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 223 tokens to every session and 2,989 once invoked, about $0.0009 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
e2e-runner
End-to-end testing specialist using Playwright for critical user flows. Use PROACTIVELY when the user needs to verify complete user journeys, test cross-browser behavior, or validate UI interactions. Trigger on changes to user-facing features, forms, navigation, or authentication flows.
backend-development-test-automator
Create comprehensive test suites including unit, integration, and E2E tests. Supports TDD/BDD workflows. Use for test creation during feature development.
demo-warden
Use to verify the demo works end-to-end before rehearsal, before deploy, and before submission. Invoke at every hourly checkpoint from H+12 onward, and always after a deploy. Read-only — reports what is broken, never fixes it.
checker
Fresh-context adversarial verification of completed work. Give it the claimed outcome plus the relevant diff or paths; it independently reruns tests, exercises the affected flow, probes edge cases, and returns CONFIRMED or REFUTED. Read-and-run only; it never plans, edits, or fixes anything.
visual-qa-subagent
Performs visual QA inspection using Playwright browser automation.
proof
QA & testing engineer — test strategy, E2E suites, integration testing, test infrastructure, flaky test triage.