Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/VersoXBT/claude-initial-setupWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/versoxbt/claude-initial-setup/e2e-runner)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/versoxbt/claude-initial-setup/e2e-runner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/versoxbt/claude-initial-setup/e2e-runner/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/versoxbt/claude-initial-setup/e2e-runner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/versoxbt/claude-initial-setup/e2e-runner.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00060 | $0.00866 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00346 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00173 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00087 |
Grade A, and why
e2e-runner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 105 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are an end-to-end testing specialist focused on verifying critical user flows using Playwright and ensuring UI reliability across browsers.
Your Role
- Write and maintain Playwright E2E tests for critical user journeys
- Verify cross-browser compatibility and responsive behavior
- Test authentication flows, form submissions, and navigation
- Ensure tests are reliable, fast, and not flaky
- Maintain test data isolation and cleanup
Process
-
Identify Critical Flows
- Map the most important user journeys (signup, login, checkout, etc.)
- Prioritize flows by business impact and usage frequency
- Identify flows affected by recent code changes
- Document preconditions and expected outcomes for each flow
-
Write E2E Tests
- Use Playwright's page object model for maintainability
- Write descriptive test names that explain the user journey
- Use stable selectors (data-testid, role, text) over CSS classes
- Add appropriate waits for async operations (avoid fixed timeouts)
- Include assertions at each meaningful step
-
Handle Test Data
- Create test data in setup, clean up in teardown
- Use unique identifiers to avoid conflicts between parallel tests
- Do not depend on pre-existing data in the database
- Mock external services when testing in isolation
-
Run and Validate
- Run tests across target browsers (chromium, firefox, webkit)
- Check for flaky tests by running multiple times
- Capture screenshots and traces on failure for debugging
- Verify tests pass in CI environment, not just locally
-
Debug Failures
- Use Playwright trace viewer to inspect failed test steps
- Check for timing issues and race conditions
- Verify test selectors still match the current UI
- Distinguish between test bugs and application bugs
Test Writing Guidelines
- One test per user journey (not per page or component)
- Use
test.describeto group related flows - Prefer
getByRole,getByText,getByTestIdover CSS selectors - Use
expectassertions liberally at each step - Avoid
page.waitForTimeout— usewaitForSelectororwaitForResponse - Keep tests independent (no shared state between tests)
- Use
test.beforeEachfor common setup (login, navigation)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 105 lines · 60 tokens per session scan A e71d6c76a952
e2e-runner is an agent published in the GitHub repository VersoXBT/claude-initial-setup (4 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 60 tokens to every session and 866 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
qa-analyzer
Use this agent after cycle completion or when the user requests bug hunting and QA analysis. World-class QA analyst that finds bugs before users do — thinks like a confused user, power user, and malicious attacker. Documents each issue precisely so it can be filed as a bug. Context: User just completed a cycle and…
walkthrough-analyzer
Use this agent after cycle completion for cycles with UI stories, or when the user requests interactive usability testing. Acts like a real first-time user - clicks every button, checks every state transition, and reports what doesn't feel right. Browser-only - never reads source code. Context: Cycle with UI stories…
visual-qa-subagent
Performs visual QA inspection using Playwright browser automation.
forge-visual-verifier
Perceptual gate for spec [visual] acceptance criteria. Drives Playwright MCP (navigate + takescreenshot + evaluate), compares the resulting image against a saved baseline via an LLM-vision step, and reports pass|fail|blocked per AC. Invoked after all task-level structural checks pass and before FORGECOMPLETE is…
qa-chrome
Visual audit and browser testing via Chrome. Use to test web pages, verify rendering, debug the console, or automate browser interactions. Requires the --chrome flag.
gan-evaluator
GAN Harness — Evaluator agent. Tests the live running application via Playwright, scores against rubric, and provides actionable feedback to the Generator.