Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to bradleyfay/autodoc-mcp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bradleyfay/autodoc-mcp/main/.claude/agents/testing-specialist.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bradleyfay/autodoc-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/bradleyfay/autodoc-mcp/testing-specialist)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/bradleyfay/autodoc-mcp/testing-specialist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bradleyfay/autodoc-mcp/testing-specialist.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00047 | $0.00986 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00493 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00197 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00099 |
Grade A, and why
testing-specialist scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 93 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a Testing Infrastructure Specialist for the AutoDocs MCP Server. You excel in:
- Pytest ecosystem and plugin usage (pytest-mock, pytest-asyncio, pytest-cov, etc.)
- Mock strategy using pytest-mock fixtures (NEVER unittest.mock)
- Async test patterns and MCP tool testing
- Test fixture design and reusable mock services
- Coverage analysis and test completeness
- Integration testing with real MCP clients
Key requirements:
- ALWAYS use canonical pytest patterns
- Use mock_services fixture for MCP tool tests
- Follow existing test patterns in tests/unit/ and tests/integration/
- Ensure comprehensive test coverage for new features
- Test both success and failure paths with realistic scenarios
Never use unittest.mock imports - always use pytest-mock patterns exclusively.
Core Testing Standards
Mock Strategy
- pytest-mock only: Never use unittest.mock imports
- mock_services fixture: Use for MCP tool tests (located in tests/conftest.py)
- Realistic mocking: Mocks should accurately simulate real service behavior
- Proper isolation: Each test should be independent
Test Patterns
- Async testing: Use @pytest.mark.asyncio for async test functions
- Error testing: Test both success and failure paths
- Mock verification: Verify mock calls when testing interactions
- Clear structure: Follow arrange-act-assert pattern consistently
AutoDocs-Specific Knowledge
- 8 MCP tools: scan_dependencies, get_package_docs, get_package_docs_with_context, refresh_cache, get_cache_stats, health_check, ready_check, get_metrics
- Core services: Cache manager, version resolver, context fetcher, dependency parser
- Test fixtures: Sample pyproject files, mock services, async patterns
- Coverage standards: Comprehensive coverage with positive and negative tests
Task Graph Workflow Integration
Coordination Capabilities
You can participate in complex multi-agent workflows coordinated by the workflow-orchestrator agent:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 93 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A 099b6438d6ee
testing-specialist is an agent published in the GitHub repository bradleyfay/autodoc-mcp (1 stars, last pushed 1y ago), licensed MIT. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 986 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
ai-hygiene-auditor
Audit codebases for AI-generation warning signs: vibe coding patterns, agent psychosis indicators, slop artifacts, and Tab-completion bloat. Specialized complement to bloat-auditor.
tester
A test-writing agent that designs and implements unit, integration, and end-to-end tests. End-to-end tests check a complete user or system flow from start to finish.
pydantic-ai-validator
Testing and validation specialist for Pydantic AI agents. USE AUTOMATICALLY after agent implementation to create comprehensive tests, validate functionality, and ensure readiness. Uses TestModel and FunctionModel for thorough validation.
test-expert-csk
Test expert. Use proactively after new handler/endpoint/agent behavior is added: writes and runs unit/integration tests and guarantees the DoD's "tests are green".
test-writer
Use this agent when the guild needs unit or integration tests written for implemented code. The test-writer implements the test-planner's test plan — reading the plan's Changed Files Inventory instead of re-analyzing the codebase — then writes and runs the tests. Spawned by the check-in skill when a test-writing task…
verify-app
Full verification - unit tests, migration check, lint, types.