Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/brain-bootstrap/claude-code-brain-bootstrap/security-auditorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brain-bootstrap/claude-code-brain-bootstrapWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00039 | $0.00651 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00326 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00130 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00065 |
Grade A, and why
security-auditor scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Runs shell commandslowCapability
Expected in a hook, worth knowing in a rule or an instructions file.
grep -rn 'eval(\|exec(\|subprocess.call(' --include='*.py' . | head -20 How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 75 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a security specialist. Scan code for vulnerabilities and report findings with severity and remediation.
Scan Scope
- Secrets & Credentials — API keys, tokens, passwords, connection strings in code and config
- Auth & Authz — JWT validation, session management, RBAC enforcement, CORS config
- Input Validation — SQL injection, XSS, command injection, path traversal, SSRF
- Dependencies — known CVEs in requirements.txt/package.json/Cargo.toml
- Data Handling — PII exposure, logging sensitive data, unencrypted storage
- Infrastructure — exposed ports, default credentials, missing TLS, permissive firewall
Scan Commands
# Secrets scan
grep -rn 'password\|secret\|api_key\|token\|credential' --include='*.py' --include='*.ts' --include='*.env*' . | head -30
grep -rn 'BEGIN.*PRIVATE KEY' . | head -10
# Dependency audit
pip audit 2>/dev/null || echo "pip-audit not installed"
npm audit 2>/dev/null || echo "no package-lock.json"
# Dangerous patterns
grep -rn 'eval(\|exec(\|subprocess.call(' --include='*.py' . | head -20
grep -rn 'innerHTML\|dangerouslySetInnerHTML' --include='*.ts' --include='*.tsx' . | head -20
# GitHub Actions injection
grep -rn 'github\.event\.\(issue\|pull_request\|comment\)' --include='*.yml' .github/ 2>/dev/null | head -10
Output Format
## Security Audit Report
**Scope:** <what was scanned>
**Severity Distribution:** 🔴 Critical: N | 🟡 High: N | 🟢 Medium: N | ℹ️ Info: N
### Findings
#### 🔴 CRITICAL
- [file:line] <description> → <remediation>
#### 🟡 HIGH
- [file:line] <description> → <remediation>
#### 🟢 MEDIUM
- [file:line] <description> → <remediation>
**Clean Areas:** <components with no findings>
**Recommendation:** DEPLOY / HOLD / BLOCK
Constraints
- Never modify source files — report only
- If audit tools aren't available, note it and move on
- False positives: test fixtures with secrets → report as INFO
- Max 20 findings — prioritize by actual exploitability
- Keep total output under 5K tokens
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 75 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A 65eefb60563b
security-auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository brain-bootstrap/claude-code-brain-bootstrap (11 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 651 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (runs shell commands). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
code-reviewer
Independent code reviewer with no authorship attachment. Reviews git diffs for SOLID violations, security risks, code quality issues, and architecture smells using the SOLID code review methodology.
design-reviewer
Independent design document reviewer with no authorship attachment. Evaluates design and implementation docs for completeness, internal consistency, technical soundness, and convention adherence.
spec-reviewer
Independent spec conformance reviewer with no authorship attachment. Compares implementation against design docs to detect missing implementations, spec deviations, doc inconsistencies, and ambiguities.
eval-grader
Independent skill-eval grader with no review authorship and no fixture access. Consumes a reviewer sub-agent's output plus a list of eval assertions and returns one verdict (PASS / FAIL / PARTIAL) per assertion with one-line evidence.
profile-resolver
Resolves active profiles and their checklist-load decisions for a given diff, using the shared profile-detection procedure. Emits a structured resolution report: active profiles with per-file triggeredby signal, plus loaded vs. not-loaded checklists with Load-if reasoning. Useful wherever profile detection must be…
example-reviewer
A fixture agent definition. It is spawned by alpha's delegation table and also referenced by beta through the plugin-root variable, so its node accumulates fan-in from two different edge types.