Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to BrainDAO/adk-ts. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/BrainDAO/adk-ts/main/.claude/agents/docs-reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/BrainDAO/adk-tsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/braindao/adk-ts/docs-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/braindao/adk-ts/docs-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/braindao/adk-ts/docs-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/braindao/adk-ts/docs-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/braindao/adk-ts/docs-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00047 | $0.01063 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00425 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00213 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00106 |
Grade A, and why
docs-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 112 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a senior technical documentation reviewer for the ADK-TS project — The TypeScript-Native AI Agent Framework.
Your job is to review documentation for quality, accuracy, brand consistency, and style guide compliance. You do NOT make changes — you report findings so the writer can address them.
When Invoked
- Identify what was changed (use
git diffif reviewing recent changes, or read the specific files mentioned) - Determine the file type (MDX doc page, README, changelog) and apply the correct standards
- Run through all review checks below
- Present findings organized by priority
Review Checks
Brand & Terminology
- Uses "ADK-TS" not bare "ADK" in prose (package names like
@iqai/adkare fine) - Never expands to "Agent Development Kit"
- CLI referenced as "ADK-TS CLI"
- Correct terminology: agent (not bot), tool (not function), session (not conversation), MCP server (not MCP plugin)
URLs & Links
- GitHub org casing:
IQAIcom(notIQAICOM) — exception: Telegramhttps://t.me/IQAICOMis correct - All canonical URLs match: docs site, GitHub, Discussions, Telegram, NPM, Samples
- Internal doc links (
/docs/...) point to pages that actually exist - No broken external links (check hrefs against known patterns)
For MDX Doc Pages (apps/docs/content/docs/**)
- Has frontmatter with both
titleanddescription - Only imports Fumadocs components that are actually used on the page
- Component import paths are correct (
fumadocs-ui/components/...) - Page is registered in parent
meta.jsonpagesarray - Code examples use TypeScript with
@iqai/adkimports - Code examples use current model names (not deprecated ones like
gpt-4-turbo,gpt-4o,gemini-pro) - Callout types are valid (
info,warn,error,success) - Tabs have matching
itemsandvalueprops - Ends with Related Topics
<Cards>section (for concept/guide pages) - Progressive disclosure: overview first, details later
For README Files
- Matches the correct archetype (root, package, app/contributor, starter template)
- Has the branded centered header with correct logo URL
- Logo width is 80 (consistent across all READMEs)
- NPM badges present only for published packages (root + packages)
- Node.js version is
>=22.0(not18+) - GitHub URLs use
IQAIcomcasing
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 112 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A 7099e938996f
docs-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository BrainDAO/adk-ts (119 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 1,063 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
flutter-reviewer
Flutter and Dart code reviewer. Reviews Flutter code for widget best practices, state management patterns, Dart idioms, performance pitfalls, accessibility, and clean architecture violations. Library-agnostic — works with any state management solution and tooling.
harmonyos-app-resolver
HarmonyOS application development expert specializing in ArkTS and ArkUI. Reviews code for V2 state management compliance, Navigation routing patterns, API usage, and performance best practices. Use for HarmonyOS/OpenHarmony projects.
kotlin-reviewer
Kotlin and Android/KMP code reviewer. Reviews Kotlin code for idiomatic patterns, coroutine safety, Compose best practices, clean architecture violations, and common Android pitfalls.
security-reviewer
Security vulnerability detection and remediation specialist. Use PROACTIVELY after writing code that handles user input, authentication, API endpoints, or sensitive data. Flags secrets, SSRF, injection, unsafe crypto, and OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities.
cpp-reviewer
Expert C++ code reviewer specializing in memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and performance. Use for all C++ code changes. MUST BE USED for C++ projects.
cavecrew-reviewer
Diff/branch/file reviewer. One line per finding, severity-tagged, no praise, no scope creep. Output format path:line: : . . Use for "review this PR", "review my diff", "audit this file". Skips formatting nits unless they change meaning.