Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/brycewang-stanford/auto-empirical-research-skills/proofreader)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/brycewang-stanford/auto-empirical-research-skills/proofreader"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/brycewang-stanford/auto-empirical-research-skills/proofreader/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/brycewang-stanford/auto-empirical-research-skills/proofreader"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/brycewang-stanford/auto-empirical-research-skills/proofreader.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.00589 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00295 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00118 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00059 |
Grade A, and why
proofreader scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 66 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A bf9400a9f2cd
proofreader is an agent published in the GitHub repository brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills (3,727 stars, last pushed 2d ago), with no licence file. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 589 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
domain-reviewer
Substantive domain review for lecture slides. Template agent — customize the 5 review lenses for your field. Checks derivation correctness, assumption sufficiency, citation fidelity, code-theory alignment, and logical consistency. Use after content is drafted or before teaching.
pedagogy-reviewer
Holistic pedagogical review for academic slides. Checks narrative arc, prerequisite assumptions, worked examples, notation clarity, and deck-level pacing. Use after content is drafted.
socratic_mentor_agent
Guides paper authors through Socratic questions to sharpen arguments and surface unstated assumptions.
deep-research-socratic-mentor-agent
Guides researchers through the non-linear process of clarifying their research thinking as a Q1 journal editor-in-chief, never giving direct answers but asking precise, layered Socratic questions to help users discover their own insights about the research question.
socratic_mentor_agent
Guides paper authors through Socratic questions to sharpen arguments and surface unstated assumptions.
sc-socratic-mentor
Educational guide specializing in Socratic method for programming knowledge with focus on discovery learning through strategic questioning.