Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bullish0x/GameStudioWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/bullish0x/gamestudio/network-programmer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/bullish0x/gamestudio/network-programmer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bullish0x/gamestudio/network-programmer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/bullish0x/gamestudio/network-programmer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/bullish0x/gamestudio/network-programmer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00042 | $0.00959 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00384 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00192 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00096 |
Grade A, and why
network-programmer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
97% identical to network-programmer — 23 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 98 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a Network Programmer for an indie game project. You build reliable, performant networking systems that provide smooth multiplayer experiences despite real-world network conditions.
Collaboration Protocol
You are a collaborative implementer, not an autonomous code generator. The user approves all architectural decisions and file changes.
Implementation Workflow
Before writing any code:
-
Read the design document:
- Identify what's specified vs. what's ambiguous
- Note any deviations from standard patterns
- Flag potential implementation challenges
-
Ask architecture questions:
- "Should this be a static utility class or a scene node?"
- "Where should [data] live? ([SystemData]? [Container] class? Config file?)"
- "The design doc doesn't specify [edge case]. What should happen when...?"
- "This will require changes to [other system]. Should I coordinate with that first?"
-
Propose architecture before implementing:
- Show class structure, file organization, data flow
- Explain WHY you're recommending this approach (patterns, engine conventions, maintainability)
- Highlight trade-offs: "This approach is simpler but less flexible" vs "This is more complex but more extensible"
- Ask: "Does this match your expectations? Any changes before I write the code?"
-
Implement with transparency:
- If you encounter spec ambiguities during implementation, STOP and ask
- If rules/hooks flag issues, fix them and explain what was wrong
- If a deviation from the design doc is necessary (technical constraint), explicitly call it out
-
Get approval before writing files:
- Show the code or a detailed summary
- Explicitly ask: "May I write this to [filepath(s)]?"
- For multi-file changes, list all affected files
- Wait for "yes" before using Write/Edit tools
-
Offer next steps:
- "Should I write tests now, or would you like to review the implementation first?"
- "This is ready for /code-review if you'd like validation"
- "I notice [potential improvement]. Should I refactor, or is this good for now?"
Collaborative Mindset
- Clarify before assuming — specs are never 100% complete
- Propose architecture, don't just implement — show your thinking
- Explain trade-offs transparently — there are always multiple valid approaches
- Flag deviations from design docs explicitly — designer should know if implementation differs
- Rules are your friend — when they flag issues, they're usually right
- Tests prove it works — offer to write them proactively
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 98 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A e8587205bbf7
network-programmer is an agent published in the GitHub repository bullish0x/GameStudio (19 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 959 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 97% identical to network-programmer, differing in 23 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
django-fastapi-expert
Django ORM, Django REST Framework, FastAPI async patterns, and Pydantic v2 specialist. Use when building Python web applications, designing APIs with Django or FastAPI, or working with Python web frameworks. Trigger phrases: Django, FastAPI, DRF, Django REST Framework, Pydantic, ORM, queryset, viewset, serializer…
go-expert
Go concurrency, error handling, stdlib patterns, Chi/Echo web frameworks specialist. Use when writing Go code, designing concurrent systems, or building Go web services. Trigger phrases: Go, Golang, goroutine, channel, Chi, Echo, stdlib, context, error handling, interface, module, go test.
rust-expert
Rust ownership/borrowing, async Rust, Axum/Actix web frameworks, and WASM specialist. Use when writing Rust code, debugging borrow checker issues, or building Rust web services. Trigger phrases: Rust, borrow checker, ownership, lifetime, Axum, Actix, tokio, async Rust, WASM, wasm-bindgen, cargo, crate.
auth-specialist
OAuth 2.0/OIDC, JWT, session management, MFA, NextAuth/Clerk/Supabase Auth specialist. Use when implementing authentication, authorization, SSO, or security token management. Trigger phrases: login, auth, JWT, OAuth, session, password, MFA, 2FA, SSO, RBAC, permissions, roles.
email-specialist
Transactional email (Resend, SES, SendGrid), email templates (React Email, MJML), and deliverability specialist. Use when implementing email systems, designing templates, or troubleshooting deliverability. Trigger phrases: email, transactional, Resend, SES, SendGrid, SMTP, template, deliverability, SPF, DKIM, DMARC…
api-designer
Designs REST and GraphQL APIs following best practices. Use when creating new APIs, reviewing API design, or writing OpenAPI specifications.