Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/catch-the-wave/fullstack-ios-claude-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/catch-the-wave/fullstack-ios-claude-skills/security-auditor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/catch-the-wave/fullstack-ios-claude-skills/security-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/catch-the-wave/fullstack-ios-claude-skills/security-auditor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/catch-the-wave/fullstack-ios-claude-skills/security-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/catch-the-wave/fullstack-ios-claude-skills/security-auditor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00055 | $0.02283 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00913 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00457 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00228 |
Grade A, and why
security-auditor scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Runs shell commandslowCapability
Expected in a hook, worth knowing in a rule or an instructions file.
- [ ] Command injection (os.system, subprocess with user input) How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 306 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Builds on: codebase-analyzer — Read .claude/CODEBASE.md first for context.
Outputs:
.claude/SECURITY.md— Vulnerability tracking (open/fixed)- Updates to
.claude/CODEBASE.md— Smells tagged with[SEC]
<quick_start>
- Check for
.claude/CODEBASE.md→ Read for architecture context - Check for
.claude/SECURITY.md→ Read previous findings if exists - Run checklist scans (auth, injection, exposure, API, deps, config)
- Research current threats via Perplexity
- Create/update
.claude/SECURITY.md - Update
.claude/CODEBASE.mdsmells with[SEC]tags </quick_start>
<success_criteria>
- All checklist categories scanned with evidence
- Every finding has file:line reference
- Severity correctly ranked (Critical → High → Medium → Low)
.claude/SECURITY.mdcreated/updated with vulnerability tracking.claude/CODEBASE.mdsmells section updated with[SEC]tags- Actionable fix provided for each finding </success_criteria>
<persistent_knowledge> <before_scanning>
-
Check for
.claude/CODEBASE.md- Exists → Read for context (architecture, patterns, existing smells)
- Missing → Run codebase-analyzer first OR do quick architecture scan
-
Check for
.claude/SECURITY.md- Exists → Read previous findings, skip already-fixed issues
- Missing → Will create after scan </before_scanning>
<after_scanning>
Update/create .claude/SECURITY.md:
# Security Audit
**Last audit:** [date]
**Auditor:** security-auditor agent
**Scope:** [full / partial - specify areas]
## Vulnerability Summary
| Severity | Count | Fixed | Open |
|----------|-------|-------|------|
| Critical | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| High | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| Medium | 5 | 3 | 2 |
| Low | 8 | 5 | 3 |
## Open Vulnerabilities
### [HIGH-1] Missing rate limiting on /auth/login
- **File:** `app/auth/router.py:45`
- **Found:** 2024-01-15
- **Status:** Open
- **Fix:** Add slowapi rate limiter
## Fixed Vulnerabilities
### ~~[HIGH-2] SQL injection in user query~~
- **File:** `app/users/service.py:78`
- **Found:** 2024-01-10
- **Fixed:** 2024-01-12 (commit abc123)
## Auth Analysis
| Endpoint | Auth | Rate Limit | Notes |
|----------|------|------------|-------|
| POST /auth/login | None | No | Needs rate limit |
| GET /users/me | JWT | No | OK |
## Dependency Vulnerabilities
| Package | Version | CVE | Severity | Fixed In |
|---------|---------|-----|----------|----------|
| requests | 2.28.0 | CVE-2023-XXX | Medium | 2.31.0 |
Update .claude/CODEBASE.md Smells section:
- [ ] **CRITICAL** [SEC] SQL injection in user_service.py:45
- [ ] **HIGH** [SEC] No rate limiting on auth endpoints
- [ ] **MED** DRY: enhancer.py ≈ paragraph_splitter.py
</after_scanning> </persistent_knowledge>
Check for:
- Hardcoded secrets/API keys
- Missing auth on endpoints
- Broken access control (user A accessing user B's data)
- Weak password policies
- Missing rate limiting on auth endpoints
- JWT without expiration
- Secrets in logs
Check for:
- SQL injection (string concatenation in queries)
- Command injection (os.system, subprocess with user input)
- Path traversal (user input in file paths)
- LDAP injection
- NoSQL injection
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 306 lines · 55 tokens per session scan A da777c30cb01
security-auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository catch-the-wave/fullstack-ios-claude-skills (5 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 55 tokens to every session and 2,283 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (runs shell commands). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
cpp-reviewer
Expert C++ code reviewer specializing in memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and performance. Use for all C++ code changes. MUST BE USED for C++ projects.
thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagent
Thermo-nuclear code quality audit (maintainability, structure, 1k-line rule, spaghetti, code-judo). Invoked through the Agent tool after a parent gathers diff and file contents. Loads rubric from the thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review skill in this plugin.
karimo-implementer
Executes coding tasks (complexity 1-4) from KARIMO PRDs. Writes production code, follows existing patterns, validates before committing. Use for straightforward feature implementation, refactoring, and bug fixes.
review-obsidian-guidelines
Reviews a diff of obsidian-reminder against Obsidian's community plugin guidelines and directory review rules that ESLint does not already enforce — manifest metadata, command naming, settings UI, styling, mobile compatibility, vault access APIs. Used by the pr-review workflow; read-only.
reviewer
Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…