Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/catch-the-wave/fullstack-ios-claude-skills/security-auditorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/catch-the-wave/fullstack-ios-claude-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/catch-the-wave/fullstack-ios-claude-skills/security-auditor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/catch-the-wave/fullstack-ios-claude-skills/security-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/catch-the-wave/fullstack-ios-claude-skills/security-auditor.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00055 | $0.02283 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.01141 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00457 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00228 |
Grade A, and why
security-auditor scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Runs shell commandslowCapability
Expected in a hook, worth knowing in a rule or an instructions file.
- [ ] Command injection (os.system, subprocess with user input) How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 306 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Builds on: codebase-analyzer — Read .claude/CODEBASE.md first for context.
Outputs:
.claude/SECURITY.md— Vulnerability tracking (open/fixed)- Updates to
.claude/CODEBASE.md— Smells tagged with[SEC]
<quick_start>
- Check for
.claude/CODEBASE.md→ Read for architecture context - Check for
.claude/SECURITY.md→ Read previous findings if exists - Run checklist scans (auth, injection, exposure, API, deps, config)
- Research current threats via Perplexity
- Create/update
.claude/SECURITY.md - Update
.claude/CODEBASE.mdsmells with[SEC]tags </quick_start>
<success_criteria>
- All checklist categories scanned with evidence
- Every finding has file:line reference
- Severity correctly ranked (Critical → High → Medium → Low)
.claude/SECURITY.mdcreated/updated with vulnerability tracking.claude/CODEBASE.mdsmells section updated with[SEC]tags- Actionable fix provided for each finding </success_criteria>
<persistent_knowledge> <before_scanning>
-
Check for
.claude/CODEBASE.md- Exists → Read for context (architecture, patterns, existing smells)
- Missing → Run codebase-analyzer first OR do quick architecture scan
-
Check for
.claude/SECURITY.md- Exists → Read previous findings, skip already-fixed issues
- Missing → Will create after scan </before_scanning>
<after_scanning>
Update/create .claude/SECURITY.md:
# Security Audit
**Last audit:** [date]
**Auditor:** security-auditor agent
**Scope:** [full / partial - specify areas]
## Vulnerability Summary
| Severity | Count | Fixed | Open |
|----------|-------|-------|------|
| Critical | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| High | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| Medium | 5 | 3 | 2 |
| Low | 8 | 5 | 3 |
## Open Vulnerabilities
### [HIGH-1] Missing rate limiting on /auth/login
- **File:** `app/auth/router.py:45`
- **Found:** 2024-01-15
- **Status:** Open
- **Fix:** Add slowapi rate limiter
## Fixed Vulnerabilities
### ~~[HIGH-2] SQL injection in user query~~
- **File:** `app/users/service.py:78`
- **Found:** 2024-01-10
- **Fixed:** 2024-01-12 (commit abc123)
## Auth Analysis
| Endpoint | Auth | Rate Limit | Notes |
|----------|------|------------|-------|
| POST /auth/login | None | No | Needs rate limit |
| GET /users/me | JWT | No | OK |
## Dependency Vulnerabilities
| Package | Version | CVE | Severity | Fixed In |
|---------|---------|-----|----------|----------|
| requests | 2.28.0 | CVE-2023-XXX | Medium | 2.31.0 |
Update .claude/CODEBASE.md Smells section:
- [ ] **CRITICAL** [SEC] SQL injection in user_service.py:45
- [ ] **HIGH** [SEC] No rate limiting on auth endpoints
- [ ] **MED** DRY: enhancer.py ≈ paragraph_splitter.py
</after_scanning> </persistent_knowledge>
Check for:
- Hardcoded secrets/API keys
- Missing auth on endpoints
- Broken access control (user A accessing user B's data)
- Weak password policies
- Missing rate limiting on auth endpoints
- JWT without expiration
- Secrets in logs
Check for:
- SQL injection (string concatenation in queries)
- Command injection (os.system, subprocess with user input)
- Path traversal (user input in file paths)
- LDAP injection
- NoSQL injection
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 306 lines · 55 tokens per session scan A da777c30cb01
security-auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository catch-the-wave/fullstack-ios-claude-skills (5 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 55 tokens to every session and 2,283 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (runs shell commands). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to understand WHY the winner won and generate improvement suggestions.
comparator
Compare two outputs WITHOUT knowing which skill produced them.
grader
Evaluate expectations against an execution transcript and outputs.
agentic-workflows
GitHub Agentic Workflows (gh-aw) - Create, debug, and upgrade AI-powered workflows with intelligent prompt routing.