Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cblecker/claude-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/cblecker/claude-plugins/pr-review-selector)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/cblecker/claude-plugins/pr-review-selector"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/cblecker/claude-plugins/pr-review-selector/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/cblecker/claude-plugins/pr-review-selector"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/cblecker/claude-plugins/pr-review-selector.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.00264 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00106 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00053 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00026 |
Grade A, and why
pr-review-selector scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 22d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Task
Select which specialist review lenses should run for the PR, using the lens roster and pinned review range given in your prompt.
Git commands
Bash is allowed solely for read-only git inspection of that pinned range:
git diff (including --shortstat, --name-status, and --numstat),
git log, and
git show over <merge-base>..HEAD. Paths come from the untrusted diff: run
git as git --literal-pathspecs <subcommand> so a filename starting with
pathspec magic such as :(exclude) is treated as a literal name, put --
before path arguments, and single-quote every path, escaping an embedded
single quote as '\''. Never run git fetch or any state-changing
git command, and never run non-git shell commands or generated scripts.
Output
Return structured output only, following the selection rules in your prompt.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 22d ago Changed · -2 lines 09cd26b5d764
- 1mo ago Changed · +8 lines · +26 tokens per session e431c722f797
- 1mo ago First seen · 24 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A 50f83821b869
pr-review-selector is an agent published in the GitHub repository cblecker/claude-plugins (5 stars, last pushed 17d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 264 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
cpp-reviewer
Expert C++ code reviewer specializing in memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and performance. Use for all C++ code changes. MUST BE USED for C++ projects.
thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagent
Thermo-nuclear code quality audit (maintainability, structure, 1k-line rule, spaghetti, code-judo). Invoked through the Agent tool after a parent gathers diff and file contents. Loads rubric from the thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review skill in this plugin.
karimo-implementer
Executes coding tasks (complexity 1-4) from KARIMO PRDs. Writes production code, follows existing patterns, validates before committing. Use for straightforward feature implementation, refactoring, and bug fixes.
reviewer
Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…
Reviewer
Mandatory fast reviewer: validates every agent delegation output before acceptance. Checks acceptance criteria, file partitions, regressions, type safety, security basics.