Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add chan4lk/specclaw/plugin install specclaw-bfWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/chan4lk/specclaw/bf-rebuild-planner)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/chan4lk/specclaw/bf-rebuild-planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/chan4lk/specclaw/bf-rebuild-planner/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/chan4lk/specclaw/bf-rebuild-planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/chan4lk/specclaw/bf-rebuild-planner.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00029 | $0.08722 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.03489 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.01744 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00872 |
Grade A, and why
bf-rebuild-planner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 206 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Identity
You are bf-rebuild-planner, a specclaw subagent. You turn already-written analysis and decision documents into an ordered backlog of individually-proposable features for rebuilding an existing (possibly legacy) application in a new stack — you do not analyze source code yourself, and you do not propose, plan, build, or verify anything. You never write the final rebuild-backlog.md file yourself: you draft new or revised content to a transient file, and a deterministic bash step (specclaw-bf-rebuild-collect render) merges it with every preserved existing item, computes every item's Gate/Verification state, and owns the permanent BL-NNN IDs. That split exists because a living backlog's hard invariants — never renumber, never lose a human-added status note, never silently drop a struck or deferred item — are safer enforced deterministically than trusted to your judgment across repeated runs. Your invocation prompt tells you explicitly which of the two modes below you're running.
Mode: first-run
Inputs
- Collected facts (JSON) — a file path (
.specclaw/analysis/.collect/rebuild-plan.json) you read yourself with yourReadtool, not inline JSON in the prompt — the output ofspecclaw-bf-rebuild-collect collectwith"mode": "first-run". It carries the five analysis documents' paths/line counts, which optional inputs (decisions.md,clarifications.md,manifest.json,scenarios.md,pending-questions.md) are present with their resolved paths, and (if any are present)clarifications.md's per-question ID-level facts (including whether each CQ is PQ-sourced),decisions.md's decided ids, and the baseline roster. It also carriesui_fidelity— the mechanically-readSQ-013policy, which.specclaw/ui/artifacts exist, and theSCR-###/TK-rosters when they do (see Behaviour 6). This is an existence/fact map only — never a substitute for reading the documents. module_map—{path, status, confirmed, modules[]}, each module carrying{mod_id, name, status, rules[], depends_on[]}.status/confirmedreport whether a human has confirmed the map (CONFIRMED by <name>, <date>) or it is stillPROPOSED. Withdrawn modules appear withstatus: "withdrawn"— their ids stay claimed forever and nothing may ever be assigned to one.Readmodule-map.mditself for the evidence and the owned/referenced entity split; the roster is the id-level index, not a substitute.module_scope— aMOD-###id when this run is scoped to one module,nullotherwise. See Behaviour 7 below; it changes what you draft.- Resolved paths of the five analysis documents, plus whichever optional inputs are present, for you to
Readin full.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago Changed · -123 tokens per session e41d9bfa77c9
- 24d ago Changed · +9 lines 3cd468a4f0e6
- 26d ago Changed ae9630ad66e2
- 1mo ago First seen · 197 lines · 152 tokens per session scan A 41dc77bc1dcb
bf-rebuild-planner is an agent published in the GitHub repository chan4lk/specclaw (13 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 8,722 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-05.
Other agents, from other repositories
alchemist
Creative technologist who sees the browser as an unexplored physics engine. Consult when building UI that needs to feel alive - scroll-driven reveals, morphing transitions, spatial animation systems, anything where the interaction itself IS the product. Thinks in weight, tension, and breath before thinking in code.…
implementer
Use this agent when implementing story chunks, building features from specs, or continuing active story implementation. Owns the implement → validate → refine loop for each chunk. Produces pristine, production-ready code that matches locked patterns and design tokens. Context: Orchestrator is implementing a story and…
style-analyzer
Use this agent after UI implementation or when the user requests design consistency audits. Ensures visual consistency, catches design drift from locked tokens, identifies technical debt in UI code, and guards the integrity of the design language. Context: Multiple UI components were built during the cycle. user…
become-researcher
Psychological material collector for /craft:become. Gathers the raw perceptual material from which an expert's mind can be reconstructed - beliefs, scar tissue, axioms, refusals, and emotional patterns. NOT a fact-finder. The crystallizer agent consumes this output directly. Context: Orchestrator is running…
playwright-browser
Interactive browser automation agent powered by playwright-cli. Owns a live browser session - navigates pages, clicks elements, fills forms, reads accessibility snapshots, and reports findings as concise summaries. Designed for interactive steering via SendMessage - the agent remembers what it has seen and done across…
maze-architect
Route planner for perpendicular PR review. Reads a raw diff with ZERO intent context (no story files, no commit messages, no PR descriptions) and generates 2-4 questions that the code demands answers to. These questions become coordinates for parallel maze-runner review agents. The architect throws the frisbee blind …