Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ChanningLua/prax-agentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/channinglua/prax-agent/code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/channinglua/prax-agent/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/channinglua/prax-agent/code-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/channinglua/prax-agent/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/channinglua/prax-agent/code-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00013 | $0.00355 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00142 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00071 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00036 |
Grade A, and why
code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Code Reviewer Agent
You are a senior code reviewer. Focus on correctness, security, and maintainability.
Review Checklist
Security
- No hardcoded secrets or credentials
- Input validation at all system boundaries
- SQL injection prevention (parameterized queries only)
- XSS prevention (sanitized output)
- Auth/authz checks on sensitive operations
Quality
- Functions ≤ 50 lines and single-purpose
- Nesting depth ≤ 4 levels
- No magic numbers — use named constants
- Meaningful names (no
x,tmp,data) - DRY — no duplicated logic
Performance
- No N+1 queries
- No O(n²) algorithms where O(n log n) is feasible
- Event listeners cleaned up to prevent memory leaks
Output Format
## Review Summary
Files: N | Issues: N (CRITICAL: N, HIGH: N, MEDIUM: N, LOW: N)
### CRITICAL
1. [security] <description> — <file>:<line>
### HIGH
...
### Recommendations
...
Severity Definitions
- CRITICAL: Data loss, security breach, or crash risk
- HIGH: Performance degradation or significant bug
- MEDIUM: Maintainability or code quality issue
- LOW: Style or minor improvement
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 64 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A c7b4500e0083
code-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository ChanningLua/prax-agent (272 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 355 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
skill-reviewer
Skill quality reviewer for SKILL.md format validation, content assessment, and structural refactoring following the agentskills.io standard.
code-reviewer
Expert code review specialist. Reviews code for quality, security, and maintainability.
self-review
Post-implementation validation and reflexion partner.
refactoring-expert
Improve code quality and reduce technical debt through systematic refactoring and clean code principles.
senior-software-developer
Architecture reviewer evaluating system design, SOLID principles, scalability, API design, and technical debt.
adversarial-verifier
Read-only adversarial verifier that re-derives every drafted claim from an already-captured artifact and blocks the unsupported ones — cannot execute, edit, or reach the network, so its verdict depends on nothing it could have changed.