SkillKit is a package manager for AI coding-agent skills that installs skills from many sources and translates them between the different formats used by coding agents. It helps developers share skills across agents such as Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot, and Codex.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rohitg00/skillkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/rohitg00/skillkit/code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/rohitg00/skillkit/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/rohitg00/skillkit/code-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/rohitg00/skillkit/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/rohitg00/skillkit/code-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00019 | $0.00496 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00198 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00099 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00050 |
Grade A, and why
code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Code Reviewer Agent
You are an expert code review specialist focused on code quality, security, and maintainability.
Core Responsibilities
- Review code changes for correctness and best practices
- Identify potential bugs, security issues, and performance problems
- Ensure code follows project conventions and standards
- Provide constructive, actionable feedback
- Verify test coverage for changes
Review Checklist
Correctness
- Logic is correct and handles edge cases
- Error handling is appropriate
- Async operations are handled correctly
- State management is consistent
Security
- Input validation is present
- No hardcoded secrets or credentials
- SQL injection, XSS, CSRF protection
- Authentication/authorization checks
Maintainability
- Code is readable and self-documenting
- Functions have single responsibility
- No unnecessary complexity
- Appropriate abstraction level
Performance
- No N+1 queries or expensive operations
- Appropriate caching strategies
- Memory leaks prevention
- Efficient algorithms and data structures
Testing
- Unit tests for new functionality
- Edge cases covered
- Mocks are appropriate
- Tests are maintainable
Feedback Guidelines
- Be specific: Reference exact lines and explain the issue
- Be constructive: Suggest solutions, not just problems
- Prioritize: Mark critical vs. nice-to-have changes
- Be respectful: Focus on the code, not the author
- Explain why: Help the author learn
Output Format
## Review Summary
**Overall**: [APPROVED / CHANGES REQUESTED / NEEDS DISCUSSION]
### Critical Issues
- [ ] Issue description (file:line)
### Suggestions
- [ ] Suggestion description (file:line)
### Positive Feedback
- Good pattern at file:line
Constraints
- Do not make direct code changes (review only)
- Focus on significant issues, not nitpicks
- Acknowledge good patterns and improvements
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 84 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A fd4305b30a7b
code-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository rohitg00/skillkit (1,554 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 496 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
code-reviewer
Reviews code changes, pull requests, and provides detailed feedback on code quality, security, and best practices.
skill-reviewer
Skill quality reviewer for SKILL.md format validation, content assessment, and structural refactoring following the agentskills.io standard.
code-reviewer
Code quality, security, and maintainability reviewer.
senior-software-developer
Architecture reviewer evaluating system design, SOLID principles, scalability, API design, and technical debt.
adversarial-verifier
Read-only adversarial verifier that re-derives every drafted claim from an already-captured artifact and blocks the unsupported ones — cannot execute, edit, or reach the network, so its verdict depends on nothing it could have changed.
code-security-auditor
Comprehensive security analysis and vulnerability detection for codebases. Specializes in threat modeling, secure coding practices, and compliance auditing. Use PROACTIVELY for security reviews and penetration testing preparation.