Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/charlesjones-dev/claude-code-plugins-devWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/charlesjones-dev/claude-code-plugins-dev/modernize-auditor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/charlesjones-dev/claude-code-plugins-dev/modernize-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/charlesjones-dev/claude-code-plugins-dev/modernize-auditor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/charlesjones-dev/claude-code-plugins-dev/modernize-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/charlesjones-dev/claude-code-plugins-dev/modernize-auditor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.00273 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00109 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00055 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00027 |
Grade A, and why
modernize-auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Load the modernize-audit skill and follow its methodology, then provide a structured report using the modernize-audit skill's defined template. If the invoking command specifies "quick-scan" mode, use the abbreviated scan report format from the modernize-scan skill instead.
Use the configuration provided by the invoking command (AI tool history, technology stack, assessment categories, scope, and severity threshold). Assess the codebase across the 12 technical debt categories:
- SOLID/DRY/KISS violations
- Type safety and language misuse
- Error handling
- Security anti-patterns
- Performance anti-patterns
- Testing gaps
- Architecture debt
- Frontend debt
- Dependency health
- AI hallucination artifacts
- Modern pattern gaps
- Configuration and DevOps debt
Verify every finding against actual source code with exact file paths and line numbers, include before/after remediation examples, provide AI-assisted fix time estimates, calculate a Modernization Score (0-100), and produce a phased modernization roadmap. Save the report to /docs/modernize/ with the timestamped filename required by the skill.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago Changed · -1 tokens per session 0d4fd58c24a6
- 1mo ago First seen · 26 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A 571b6ad40b5d
modernize-auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository charlesjones-dev/claude-code-plugins-dev (35 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 273 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
evidence-based-investigator
Investigates codebase issues by gathering concrete evidence — file paths, line numbers, code snippets, error messages, git history, and test coverage. Use when thorough, multi-angle research into a bug, failure, or unexpected behavior is needed. Does not trace runtime data flow across modules — use behavioral-analyst.…
pr-reviewer
STRICT internal pre-PR reviewer — the final gate BEFORE a PR is opened, so CodeRabbit finds fewer bugs. A generalist, diff-scoped critic that runs the repo's REAL tools, traces cross-file blast radius, verifies every finding, and applies React 19 / TS / Tauri 2 + Rust invariant checks. Use right before git push /…
debugger
Use this agent for root-cause analysis of bugs, test failures, and unexpected behavior. Follows the 5 Whys protocol and produces ROOT-CAUSE.md with evidence chain and remediation plan. Examples: Context: A test suite is failing after a recent commit and the cause is unclear. user: "Figure out why the tests are…
FlowSubmitNWatchPR
Submit PR and autonomously monitor CI checks and Copilot reviews until approval-ready. Iteratively fix issues and resubmit.
release-validator
Validates release readiness by checking tests, build, dependencies, and changelog. Use before creating a release.
fec-ui-checker
Use this subagent to troubleshoot visual defects, layout confusion, CSS issues, responsive exceptions, and inconsistencies between interaction and design in the front-end UI, and save the report as a Markdown file. Supports obtaining design data from Figma, Sketch, MasterGo, Pixso, Moko, and Mock, compares the design…