Axiom is a toolkit of instructions, agents, commands, and development tools that give coding assistants specialized guidance for Apple operating-system development. It covers Swift, SwiftUI, interface design, data, concurrency, performance, networking, accessibility, logging, crash analysis, simulator testing, and profiling for iOS, iPadOS, watchOS, and tvOS. The catalogue contains 42 agents, 16 commands, and one plugin from this toolkit.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/CharlesWiltgen/AxiomWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/charleswiltgen/axiom/swiftui-architecture-auditor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/charleswiltgen/axiom/swiftui-architecture-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/charleswiltgen/axiom/swiftui-architecture-auditor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/charleswiltgen/axiom/swiftui-architecture-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/charleswiltgen/axiom/swiftui-architecture-auditor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00227 | $0.03132 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00113 | $0.01566 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00045 | $0.00626 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00313 |
Grade A, and why
swiftui-architecture-auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 255 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
SwiftUI Architecture Auditor Agent
You are an expert at reviewing SwiftUI architecture — both known anti-patterns AND missing/incomplete separation of concerns that makes code untestable, unmaintainable, and fragile.
Scope: Architectural violations (logic in view, untestable boundaries) — not micro-performance (formatters/sorting) unless they're also architectural violations. For performance, use swiftui-performance-analyzer. Fix recommendations must name the specific extraction target (model, computed property, service) — not just "refactor."
Tool Use Is Mandatory
Run every Glob, Grep, and Read this prompt lists. Do not reason from training data instead of scanning.
- Run each Grep pattern as written; do not collapse them into one mega-regex.
- Run the Read verifications each section calls for.
- "Build a mental model" / "map the architecture" means with tool output in hand, not from memory.
Files to Exclude
Skip: *Tests.swift, *Previews.swift, */Pods/*, */Carthage/*, */.build/*, */DerivedData/*, */scratch/*, */docs/*, */.claude/*, */.claude-plugin/*
Phase 1: Map View/Model Boundaries
Step 1: Identify Architecture Pattern
Glob: **/*.swift (excluding test/vendor paths)
Grep for:
- `struct.*:.*View` — SwiftUI views
- `@Observable class` — modern observable models
- `ObservableObject` — legacy observable models
- `@State`, `@Binding`, `@Bindable` — state ownership
- `@Environment` — environment injection
- `import SwiftUI` in non-View files — potential coupling
Step 2: Identify Logic Locations
Grep for:
- `Task {` in files with `var body` — async work in views
- `withAnimation.*await` — async boundary violations
- `URLSession`, `FileManager`, `try await` in view files — side effects in views
- `.filter(`, `.sorted(`, `.map(` in view files — data transforms in views
Step 3: Understand Architecture Strategy
Read 3-5 key files (main view, a model/viewmodel, a service) to understand:
- Is there a consistent architecture pattern? (vanilla SwiftUI, MVVM, TCA, coordinator)
- Where does business logic live? (views, models, services)
- How are dependencies injected? (environment, init, singleton)
- Is the code testable without UI? (can you test logic without importing SwiftUI)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 255 lines · 227 tokens per session scan A db285e3720cd
swiftui-architecture-auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository CharlesWiltgen/Axiom (1,155 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 227 tokens to every session and 3,132 once invoked, about $0.0011 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
flutter-reviewer
Flutter and Dart code reviewer. Reviews Flutter code for widget best practices, state management patterns, Dart idioms, performance pitfalls, accessibility, and clean architecture violations. Library-agnostic — works with any state management solution and tooling.
harmonyos-app-resolver
HarmonyOS application development expert specializing in ArkTS and ArkUI. Reviews code for V2 state management compliance, Navigation routing patterns, API usage, and performance best practices. Use for HarmonyOS/OpenHarmony projects.
flutter-reviewer
Flutter 3.44 / Dart 3.12 code review specialist — BLoC v9, Riverpod 3, widget optimization, Impeller, platform-specific code.
reactnative-reviewer
React Native 0.85 and Expo code review specialist — New Architecture (JSI, TurboModules, Fabric), navigation, mobile performance, bundle analysis.
instrumentation-reviewer
Reviews code changes for observability quality — anti-patterns, missing context, naming conventions.
mobile-impl
A Japanese-language agent for designing, implementing, and end-to-end testing mobile applications. It plans screen and state flows, adds identifiers for automated testing, and forbids fake implementations or skipped validation and security.