pe-governance

pe-governance is an agent for Claude Code from clafollett/lafollettlabs-claude-plugins. It costs 93 tokens per session (5,860 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A code-review agent for the documents that control how other coding agents behave, including agent definitions, skills, plugin instructions, and CLAUDE.md files.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review changes to agent-governance files, check their structure and permissions, and return findings in structured YAML.
Why use it?
It helps catch unclear rules, conflicting schemas, unsafe permissions, and differences between dispatchers and the instructions agents run before those problems cause silent failures.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin. Also seen: reads .claude/ paths; mentions CLAUDE.md.

Needs its repository: it runs a file that does not travel with it, so clone the repository first. The line is if ./docs/code-reviews/{name}-code-review.md exists:.

Part of the code-reviewer plugin — 2 skills, 5 agents shipped together

Good fit Use it to review changes to agent-governance files, check their structure and permissions, and return findings in structured YAML.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install

Getting it into your agent

It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/clafollett/lafollettlabs-claude-plugins
agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/clafollett/lafollettlabs-claude-plugins/pe-governance

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install code-reviewer, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 2 skills, 5 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for pe-governance

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/clafollett/lafollettlabs-claude-plugins/pe-governance/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/clafollett/lafollettlabs-claude-plugins/pe-governance)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/clafollett/lafollettlabs-claude-plugins/pe-governance"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/clafollett/lafollettlabs-claude-plugins/pe-governance/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for pe-governance

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/clafollett/lafollettlabs-claude-plugins/pe-governance"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/clafollett/lafollettlabs-claude-plugins/pe-governance.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 93 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 5,860 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 1 finding. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00093 $0.05860
Opus 5 $0.00046 $0.02930
Sonnet 5 $0.00019 $0.01172
Haiku 4.5 $0.00009 $0.00586

Measured 11d ago against content hash 82b020bf3f1f, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

pe-governance scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Reads agent configuration directorieslowAgent snooping

.claude/, .codex/, .gemini/ hold keys, settings and other credentials a mod has no legitimate need for.

grep -rn "<filename>" <worktree>/.claude/ <worktree>/docs/rules/

Downgraded: this mod is about security review, or the phrase is quoted, so it is likely naming the pattern rather than instructing it.

plugins/code-reviewer/agents/pe-governance.md · 548 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 548 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

You are PE-Governance, a senior reviewer of agent governance documents. The code-reviewer skill dispatches you with a diff and scope rules; you execute a four-pass review (Architecture → Quality → Security → mandatory Adversarial Re-read) and return findings as structured YAML.

These files load into the model's context on every invocation. They are not human documentation — they are the runtime contract between dispatcher and agent. Bugs here cause silent agent misbehavior, tool-permission errors, and dispatcher/runtime drift. Your job is to catch them before they ship.

Inputs

The parent provides metadata — you pull your own diff and read full files:

  • Diff command — the git diff command to run (you execute it yourself)
  • Key files changed — bullet list of affected files (from --stat)
  • Scope — Branch Diff, Staged Diff, or PR Review (affects in_scope determination)
  • Issue ID — for cross-referencing in findings
  • Worktree path — repo root for grepping cross-file references
  • Prior review (round 2+) — path to prior review doc

Workflow

1. Run the diff command yourself. Identify governance files in scope (frontmatter + body).
2. Read FULL FILES (not just diff hunks) for every changed governance file.
   The diff shows what changed; the full file shows whether the change breaks
   existing decision trees, schemas, or cross-file references.
3. cd <worktree> for all Bash operations.
4. Round-to-round continuity check (skip if round 1):
     if ./docs/code-reviews/{name}-code-review.md exists:
       read latest round's findings
       for each prior_finding:
         pattern still in current diff → re-flag as STILL_PRESENT
                                          (severity unchanged unless context shifts)
         pattern no longer present     → mark RESOLVED (do NOT re-raise)
5. Run lint-shaped checks (Pass 2 — see below). Capture results.
6. Five serialized passes (Architecture → Quality → Security → Adversarial → Self-Adversarial).
   Passes 4 AND 5 are MANDATORY — skipping either is a dispatch-contract violation.
7. If dispatch_input.STORY_LINKED is true: Read(dispatch_input.SPEC_COVERAGE_PROTOCOL)
   and execute § Spec Coverage (Story-Linked PRs). Append SPEC-* findings to YAML.
8. Deliver YAML findings. NO PROSE OUTSIDE THE YAML BLOCK.
     match invocation_mode:
       foreground (no team_name)        → return YAML as final tool-result message
       background-teammate (team_name)  → SendMessage(to: "team-lead", message: <yaml>)
                                           idle-after-render does NOT deliver — must call the tool

Read the full file on GitHub · 548 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 548 lines · 93 tokens per session scan A 82b020bf3f1f

Subscribe to this mod's changes

pe-governance is an agent published in the GitHub repository clafollett/lafollettlabs-claude-plugins (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 93 tokens to every session and 5,860 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (reads agent configuration directories). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

reviewer

Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…

genkovich/sdd · 81 tokens

atomic-auditor

Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…

damusix/atomic-claude · 169 tokens

bt6-pr-auditor

Reviews one pull request in a BT6 codebase for correctness, research integrity, security, verification quality, and merge readiness.

elder-plinius/T3MP3ST · 32 tokens

Reviewer

Mandatory fast reviewer: validates every agent delegation output before acceptance. Checks acceptance criteria, file partitions, regressions, type safety, security basics.

monkilabs/opencastle · 30 tokens

security-auditor

Use this agent when reviewing local code changes or pull requests to identify security vulnerabilities and risks. This agent should be invoked proactively after completing security-sensitive changes or before merging any PR.

NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit · 40 tokens

reviewer-architecture

Use this agent for architecture-focused code review. Evaluates implementation against the plan's architectural decisions, checks separation of concerns, pattern consistency, and proper use of existing abstractions. Spawned in parallel with other reviewers when a review task is dispatched.

HirogaKatageri/hirokata · 56 tokens