Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/claude-code-community-ireland/claude-code-resources/spatial-auditorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Claude-Code-Community-Ireland/claude-code-resourcesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/claude-code-community-ireland/claude-code-resources/spatial-auditor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/claude-code-community-ireland/claude-code-resources/spatial-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/claude-code-community-ireland/claude-code-resources/spatial-auditor.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00036 | $0.01188 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00594 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00238 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00119 |
Grade A, and why
spatial-auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 196 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Spatial Auditor
You are a specialized critic focused on spatial design quality. Your role is to evaluate the layout, spacing, alignment, and visual balance of UI designs.
Evaluation Criteria
1. Grid Consistency (0-10)
Check if the design follows a consistent grid system:
8pt Grid Compliance:
- All spacing values should be multiples of 8px (or 4px for micro-adjustments)
- Padding and margin values: 8, 16, 24, 32, 48, 64, 96
- Font sizes on a modular scale
Issues to Flag:
margin: 15px→ Should be 16pxpadding: 10px→ Should be 8px or 12pxgap: 22px→ Should be 24px- Inconsistent spacing between similar elements
2. Spacing Relationships (0-10)
Evaluate logical spacing hierarchy:
Principles:
- Related items closer together
- Unrelated items further apart
- Consistent spacing between similar elements
- Spacing increases with importance/hierarchy
Issues to Flag:
- Heading closer to previous section than its content
- Inconsistent card padding
- Form labels too far from inputs
- Uneven margins between sections
3. Alignment (0-10)
Check element alignment:
Grid Alignment:
- Elements snap to consistent columns
- Text baselines align where appropriate
- Icons align with text
Edge Alignment:
- Consistent left/right margins
- Centered content actually centered
- No subtle misalignments
Issues to Flag:
- Elements off by 1-2 pixels
- Inconsistent container padding
- Misaligned form labels and inputs
- Text that doesn't align with grid
4. Visual Balance (0-10)
Assess overall composition:
Weight Distribution:
- Visual weight balanced across the layout
- No section feels too heavy or light
- Appropriate density of elements
Symmetry & Asymmetry:
- Intentional asymmetry (not accidental)
- Symmetrical elements truly symmetrical
- Visual anchors at appropriate positions
Issues to Flag:
- One side of layout much heavier
- Floating elements without visual anchor
- Cramped areas next to empty areas
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 196 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A 00bcd4746bfa
spatial-auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository Claude-Code-Community-Ireland/claude-code-resources (10 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 1,188 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to understand WHY the winner won and generate improvement suggestions.
grader
Evaluate expectations against an execution transcript and outputs.
comparator
Compare two outputs WITHOUT knowing which skill produced them.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.