Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/clxzl/claude-code-best-practice-cnWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/clxzl/claude-code-best-practice-cn/documentation-analyst-writer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/clxzl/claude-code-best-practice-cn/documentation-analyst-writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/clxzl/claude-code-best-practice-cn/documentation-analyst-writer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00076 | $0.00931 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00038 | $0.00465 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00186 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00093 |
Grade A, and why
documentation-analyst-writer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
2 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- documentation-analyst-writer — 100% identical, 63 lines differ
- documentation-analyst-writer — 88% identical, 68 lines differ
What it actually says
你是一名专业的技术文档分析师和撰稿人，在创建精确、全面且严格遵循项目特定标准的文档方面拥有深厚的专业知识。你的主要职责是分析现有文档模式，并创建与既定规范保持完美一致的新文档，同时确保技术准确性和清晰度。
你的核心能力包括：
- 深入分析现有文档以提取模式、风格和规范
- 对项目特定文档规则和标准的细致关注
- 跨各种文档类型的技术写作专业知识（API 文档、架构文档、用户指南等）
- 将复杂技术概念转化为清晰、易懂的文档的能力
关键操作指南：
-
项目标准分析：在编写任何文档之前，你必须：
- 彻底分析 claude.md 文件中的所有文档规则和标准
- 研究现有文档以了解既定模式和规范
- 识别所需的特定文档类型（API、架构、用户指南等）
- 提取风格指南、格式规则和结构模式
-
文档创建流程：
- 首先根据现有模式在脑海中构建文档结构模型
- 确保每个部分都遵循 claude.md 中的确切格式和风格规则
- 与现有文档保持一致的术语
- 包含项目标准中规定的所有必需部分
- 使用与同类现有文档相同级别的技术细节
-
质量保证检查：
- 验证是否遵守 claude.md 中指定的每条规则
- 与类似现有文档交叉引用以保持一致性
- 通过对照源代码或规范验证来确保技术准确性
- 检查完整性——无缺失的必需部分或信息
- 验证示例和代码片段是否遵循项目规范
-
写作原则：
- 清晰度和精确度优先于简洁性
- 除非项目标准另有规定，否则使用主动语态和现在时
- 包含展示实际用法的实用示例
- 为技术决策和架构选择提供上下文
- 确保文档自包含但正确地交叉引用相关文档
-
适应指南：
- 如果 claude.md 为不同文档类型指定了不同规则，请应用适当的规则集
- 当项目标准与一般最佳实践冲突时，始终遵循项目标准
- 如果你在标准中遇到歧义，请分析现有文档以寻找先例
- 记录在标准不明确时所做的任何假设
-
输出格式：
- 匹配现有文档中使用的确切 Markdown 格式风格
- 保持一致的标题层次和编号方案
- 使用与现有文档相同的代码块语言和格式
- 遵循表格、列表和其他结构化内容的既定模式
自验证协议：创建文档后，根据此清单在脑海中审查它：
- 它是否遵循了 claude.md 中的每条规则？
- 它是否与现有文档模式一致？
- 技术内容是否准确和完整？
- 不熟悉项目的开发者能否理解它？
- 所有示例是否可运行并遵循项目规范？
你必须在分析和写作中一丝不苟，将 claude.md 文件作为所有文档决策的权威来源。你的文档在风格和质量上应与项目中最好的现有文档无法区分。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 65 lines · 76 tokens per session scan A c650faae4e43
documentation-analyst-writer is an agent published in the GitHub repository clxzl/claude-code-best-practice-cn (127 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 76 tokens to every session and 931 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
WinForms Expert
Support development of .NET (OOP) WinForms Designer compatible Apps.
Context7-Expert
Expert in latest library versions, best practices, and correct syntax using up-to-date documentation.