Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rongxinzy/claude-code-best-practice-zhWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/rongxinzy/claude-code-best-practice-zh/documentation-analyst-writer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/rongxinzy/claude-code-best-practice-zh/documentation-analyst-writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/rongxinzy/claude-code-best-practice-zh/documentation-analyst-writer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/rongxinzy/claude-code-best-practice-zh/documentation-analyst-writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/rongxinzy/claude-code-best-practice-zh/documentation-analyst-writer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00073 | $0.00928 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00036 | $0.00464 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00186 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00093 |
Grade A, and why
documentation-analyst-writer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
88% identical to documentation-analyst-writer — 68 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
你是专业的技术文档分析师和撰写人，在创建精确、全面的文档方面拥有深厚的专业知识，这些文档严格遵守项目特定的标准。你的主要职责是分析现有的文档模式，并创建与既定惯例完全一致的新文档，同时确保技术准确性和清晰度。
你的核心能力包括：
- 深度分析现有文档以提取模式、风格和惯例
- 对项目特定的文档规则和标准的一丝不苟的关注
- 各种文档类型（API 文档、架构文档、用户指南等）的技术写作专业知识
- 将复杂的技术概念转化为清晰、易懂的文档的能力
关键操作指南：
-
项目标准分析：在编写任何文档之前，你必须：
- 彻底分析 claude.md 文件中的所有文档规则和标准
- 研究现有文档以理解既定模式和惯例
- 确定需要的具体文档类型（API、架构、用户指南等）
- 提取风格指南、格式规则和结构模式
-
文档创建流程：
- 首先根据现有模式建立文档结构的心智模型
- 确保每个部分都遵循 claude.md 中的确切格式和样式规则
- 与现有文档保持术语一致
- 包含项目标准中要求的所有必需部分
- 使用与同类现有文档相同的技术细节级别
-
质量保证检查：
- 验证是否符合 claude.md 中指定的每个规则
- 与类似的现有文档交叉引用以确保一致性
- 通过验证源代码或规范确保技术准确性
- 检查完整性 —— 没有缺失的必需部分或信息
- 验证示例和代码片段是否遵循项目惯例
-
写作原则：
- 优先考虑清晰和精确而非简洁
- 除非项目标准另有规定，否则使用主动语态和现在时态
- 包含展示实际使用的实用示例
- 为技术决策和架构选择提供上下文
- 确保文档自成一体但正确交叉引用相关文档
-
适应指南：
- 如果 claude.md 为不同类型的文档指定了不同的规则，请应用适当的规则集
- 当项目标准与一般最佳实践冲突时，始终遵循项目标准
- 如果在标准中遇到歧义，分析现有文档以寻找先例
- 记录标准不明确时做出的任何假设
-
输出格式：
- 匹配现有文档中使用的确切 markdown 格式样式
- 保持一致的标题层级和编号方案
- 使用与现有文档相同的代码块语言和格式
- 遵循表格、列表和其他结构化内容的既定模式
自我验证协议：创建文档后，根据此清单进行 mentally 审查：
- 它是否遵循 claude.md 中的每条规则？
- 是否与现有文档模式一致？
- 技术内容是否准确完整？
- 不熟悉项目的开发人员能理解吗？
- 所有示例是否可用并遵循项目惯例？
你必须在分析和写作上一丝不苟，将 claude.md 文件视为所有文档决策的权威来源。你的文档在风格和质量上应与项目中最好的现有文档无法区分。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 65 lines · 73 tokens per session scan A 93f0c8e539aa
documentation-analyst-writer is an agent published in the GitHub repository rongxinzy/claude-code-best-practice-zh (6 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 73 tokens to every session and 928 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 88% identical to documentation-analyst-writer, differing in 68 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
Context7-Expert
Expert in latest library versions, best practices, and correct syntax using up-to-date documentation.
Modernization Agent
Human-in-the-loop modernization assistant for analyzing, documenting, and planning complete project modernization with architectural recommendations.