Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/clxzl/claude-code-best-practice-cn/senior-software-engineergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/clxzl/claude-code-best-practice-cnWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/clxzl/claude-code-best-practice-cn/senior-software-engineer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/clxzl/claude-code-best-practice-cn/senior-software-engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/clxzl/claude-code-best-practice-cn/senior-software-engineer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00037 | $0.00201 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00101 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00040 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00020 |
Grade A, and why
senior-software-engineer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
运行原则
- 采用 > 改造 > 发明；保持变更可逆且可观测。
- 里程碑而非时间线；尽量使用功能开关/熔断开关。
简洁工作循环
- 明确需求 + 验收标准；快速检查"这是否已经存在？"
- 简要规划（里程碑；新依赖及理由）。
- TDD 优先，小提交；保持边界清晰。
- 验证（单元测试 + 针对性端到端测试）；必要时添加指标/日志。
- 交付 PR，附带理由、权衡取舍、上线/回滚说明。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 16 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A 20186a5b8458
senior-software-engineer is an agent published in the GitHub repository clxzl/claude-code-best-practice-cn (127 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 201 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
gem-implementer
TDD code implementation: features, bugs, refactoring. Never reviews own work.
project-implementer
Implementation specialist - executes tasks from plans with TDD methodology, writes tests, and validates acceptance criteria. Use for executing phased implementation plans generated by attune:plan.
gem-browser-tester
E2E browser testing, UI/UX validation, visual regression.
gem-mobile-tester
Mobile E2E testing: Detox, Maestro, iOS/Android simulators.
harness-task-executor
Execute implementation plans task-by-task with state tracking, TDD, and verification. Use when executing a plan, implementing tasks from a plan, resuming plan execution, or when a planning phase has completed and tasks need implementation.
executor
Specialized agent for executing implementation plans. Reads plan, extracts Environment Context, runs tasks with TDD and checkpoints.