Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/coco-research/cocoWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/coco-research/coco/code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/coco-research/coco/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/coco-research/coco/code-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/coco-research/coco/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/coco-research/coco/code-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00079 | $0.01417 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00032 | $0.00567 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00283 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00142 |
Grade A, and why
code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +3 lines 4d1338c17ec8
- 1mo ago First seen · 198 lines · 79 tokens per session scan A 476c502012fd
code-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository coco-research/coco (636 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It adds 79 tokens to every session and 1,417 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
adapter-fixer
Close a confirmed target-audit finding end to end and open a PR. Never merges.
code-reviewer
Review a Go diff in agnostic-ai for bugs, style, and cross-adapter issues. Use before merging a PR.
code-reviewer
Expert code review specialist. Proactively reviews code for quality, security, and maintainability. Use immediately after writing or modifying code. MUST BE USED for all code changes.
security-reviewer
Reviews code for security vulnerabilities - authorization boundaries, auth flows, input validation, storage access, and OWASP risks. Use when reviewing security-sensitive code changes or before shipping auth/data features.
verifier
Proves the work is correct rather than merely reported. Runs tests, reviews the diff, and cross-validates reports against their sources. Blocks progression on any unproven claim.
code-reviewer
Read-only reviewer for auth, billing, and credits-ledger changes. Use proactively after modifying src/lib/auth, src/lib/billing, src/lib/credits, or src/app/api — before committing.