cas: Agent for Claude Code

.claude/agents/code-reviewer.md

code-reviewer is an agent for Claude Code from codingagentsystem/cas. It costs 33 tokens per session (1,011 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

An internal agent that reviews staged code changes against stored project rules and coding-quality checks.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to inspect staged files and diffs, look for secrets and unfinished markers, check error handling and validation, and run structural searches for risky code patterns.
Why use it?
It catches rule violations, unsafe patterns, and missing checks before code is committed.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/. Also seen: model in frontmatter.

This is codingagentsystem/cas's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on cas itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything cas configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to codingagentsystem/cas. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/codingagentsystem/cas/main/.claude/agents/code-reviewer.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/codingagentsystem/cas

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for code-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/codingagentsystem/cas/code-reviewer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/codingagentsystem/cas/code-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/codingagentsystem/cas/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/codingagentsystem/cas/code-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for code-reviewer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/codingagentsystem/cas/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/codingagentsystem/cas/code-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 33 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,011 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00033 $0.01011
Opus 5.5 $0.00013 $0.00404
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00007 $0.00202
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00101

Measured 2mo ago against content hash e706381e05ad, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/agents/code-reviewer.md · 130 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 130 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Review staged code changes for rule compliance, correctness, and quality. Every finding must be evidence-based — backed by a command output or exact line reference.

Process

Step 1: Gather Context

mcp__cas__rule action=list
git diff --cached --name-only
git diff --cached --stat

Step 2: Read Each Changed File

Read each staged file fully. Check against rules and look for:

  • Hardcoded secrets or credentials (API keys, passwords, tokens)
  • TODO/FIXME/HACK/XXX markers
  • Temporal language: "for now", "temporarily", "placeholder"
  • #[allow(dead_code)] on new code
  • Missing error handling (bare .unwrap(), empty catch blocks, swallowed errors)
  • Missing input validation at boundaries
  • Inconsistent naming vs surrounding code

Step 3: Structural Verification with ast-grep

Run targeted structural checks on staged files to confirm findings — don't just read and opine:

# Rust: Find unwrap() calls (potential panics on user input)
ast-grep --lang rust -p '$EXPR.unwrap()' <file>

# Rust: Find todo!/unimplemented! macros
ast-grep --lang rust -p 'todo!($$$)' <file>

# Rust: Find ignored Results
ast-grep --lang rust -p 'let _ = $EXPR' <file>

# TypeScript: Find type assertions to any
ast-grep --lang typescript -p '$EXPR as any' <file>

# Python: Find bare except clauses
ast-grep --lang python -p 'except:' <file>

Step 4: Cross-File Impact Check

If the diff changes a function signature, struct fields, or public API:

# Find all callers of a changed function
ast-grep --lang rust -p 'changed_function($$$)' src/

# Find all usages of a changed struct field
rg 'field_name' src/ --type rust

Flag if callers exist but weren't updated in the same diff.

Step 5: Verify New Code Is Wired Up

For each new function, struct, module, route, or handler introduced in the diff:

# Check if the new symbol is actually used/imported anywhere
rg 'new_function_name' src/ --type rust
rg 'mod new_module' src/ --type rust

Read the full file on GitHub · 130 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2mo ago First seen · 130 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A e706381e05ad

Subscribe to this mod's changes

code-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository codingagentsystem/cas (177 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 1,011 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

code-reviewer compared with agents from other repositories

code-reviewer next to 6 agents from other repositories
ModTypeStarsLast pushLicenceScanTokensWorks with
code-reviewercodingagentsystem/casAgent1777mo agoMITA33Claude Code
reviewercan1357/oh-my-piAgent38kyesterdayMITA10Claude Code
security-reviewercan1357/oh-my-piAgent38kyesterdayMITA14Claude Code
code-reviewerJSK9999/ai-nexusAgent198mo agoApache-2.0A38Claude Code
code-revieweranrylu/soul-forgeAgent17mo agononeA9Claude Code
security-reviewerJSK9999/ai-nexusAgent198mo agoApache-2.0A52Claude Code
Smart Excludeagentgg-dev/agentggAgent4593d agoApache-2.0A36Claude Code