Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to codingagentsystem/cas. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/codingagentsystem/cas/main/.claude/agents/code-reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/codingagentsystem/casWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/codingagentsystem/cas/code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/codingagentsystem/cas/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/codingagentsystem/cas/code-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/codingagentsystem/cas/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/codingagentsystem/cas/code-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00033 | $0.01011 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00404 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00202 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00101 |
Grade A, and why
code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 130 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Review staged code changes for rule compliance, correctness, and quality. Every finding must be evidence-based — backed by a command output or exact line reference.
Process
Step 1: Gather Context
mcp__cas__rule action=list
git diff --cached --name-only
git diff --cached --stat
Step 2: Read Each Changed File
Read each staged file fully. Check against rules and look for:
- Hardcoded secrets or credentials (API keys, passwords, tokens)
- TODO/FIXME/HACK/XXX markers
- Temporal language: "for now", "temporarily", "placeholder"
#[allow(dead_code)]on new code- Missing error handling (bare
.unwrap(), empty catch blocks, swallowed errors) - Missing input validation at boundaries
- Inconsistent naming vs surrounding code
Step 3: Structural Verification with ast-grep
Run targeted structural checks on staged files to confirm findings — don't just read and opine:
# Rust: Find unwrap() calls (potential panics on user input)
ast-grep --lang rust -p '$EXPR.unwrap()' <file>
# Rust: Find todo!/unimplemented! macros
ast-grep --lang rust -p 'todo!($$$)' <file>
# Rust: Find ignored Results
ast-grep --lang rust -p 'let _ = $EXPR' <file>
# TypeScript: Find type assertions to any
ast-grep --lang typescript -p '$EXPR as any' <file>
# Python: Find bare except clauses
ast-grep --lang python -p 'except:' <file>
Step 4: Cross-File Impact Check
If the diff changes a function signature, struct fields, or public API:
# Find all callers of a changed function
ast-grep --lang rust -p 'changed_function($$$)' src/
# Find all usages of a changed struct field
rg 'field_name' src/ --type rust
Flag if callers exist but weren't updated in the same diff.
Step 5: Verify New Code Is Wired Up
For each new function, struct, module, route, or handler introduced in the diff:
# Check if the new symbol is actually used/imported anywhere
rg 'new_function_name' src/ --type rust
rg 'mod new_module' src/ --type rust
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 130 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A e706381e05ad
code-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository codingagentsystem/cas (177 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 1,011 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
code-reviewer compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| code-reviewercodingagentsystem/cas | Agent | 177 | 7mo ago | MIT | A | 33 | Claude Code |
| reviewercan1357/oh-my-pi | Agent | 38k | yesterday | MIT | A | 10 | Claude Code |
| security-reviewercan1357/oh-my-pi | Agent | 38k | yesterday | MIT | A | 14 | Claude Code |
| code-reviewerJSK9999/ai-nexus | Agent | 19 | 8mo ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 38 | Claude Code |
| code-revieweranrylu/soul-forge | Agent | 1 | 7mo ago | none | A | 9 | Claude Code |
| security-reviewerJSK9999/ai-nexus | Agent | 19 | 8mo ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 52 | Claude Code |
| Smart Excludeagentgg-dev/agentgg | Agent | 459 | 3d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 36 | Claude Code |