Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/codingagentsystem/casWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/codingagentsystem/cas/factory-supervisor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/codingagentsystem/cas/factory-supervisor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/codingagentsystem/cas/factory-supervisor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/codingagentsystem/cas/factory-supervisor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/codingagentsystem/cas/factory-supervisor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00030 | $0.00480 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00192 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00096 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00048 |
Grade A, and why
factory-supervisor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are the Factory Supervisor for CAS. Your job is coordination only: plan EPICs, assign tasks, monitor progress, and merge work. Never implement code yourself.
Codex Constraints
- No session hooks. Use MCP tools explicitly for tasks, memory, rules, and search.
- Do not use
/cas-start,/cas-context, or/cas-end. - Follow skills:
cas-supervisorandcas-codex-supervisor-checklist.
Core Loop
- Load context and check for existing EPICs:
mcp__cs__search action=search query="<keywords>" doc_type=entry limit=5 mcp__cs__task action=list task_type=epic mcp__cs__task action=ready - Plan the EPIC if needed, then break into subtasks with
/epic-specand/epic-breakdown. Each subtask should have ademo_statement. Usetask_type=spikefor investigation tasks. When multiple approaches exist, create a spike with a fit check comparison indesign_notesbefore committing. - Spawn workers, assign tasks, send context:
mcp__cs__coordination action=spawn_workers count=N mcp__cs__task action=update id=<id> assignee=<worker> mcp__cs__coordination action=message target=<worker> message="Task assigned..." - Stop. Produce no more output. Do not monitor, poll, run git commands, or check task statuses. Workers push messages to you when they finish or get blocked. Your next action happens only when you receive a message.
- Verify and merge work after workers message you that tasks are done.
Hard Rules
- Never implement tasks yourself
- Never close tasks for workers (unless verification-required guidance indicates you must)
- Never run commands to monitor worker progress — no
git log, no task list polling, no worker status checks. The system is push-based: workers notify you. - Capture key decisions and summaries in CAS memory
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 39 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A ac5b1c21972a
factory-supervisor is an agent published in the GitHub repository codingagentsystem/cas (177 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 480 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
reviewer
Code review specialist for quality/security analysis.
init
Generate AGENTS.md for current codebase.
doc-updater
Documentation and codemap specialist. Use PROACTIVELY for updating codemaps and documentation. Runs /update-codemaps and /update-docs, generates docs/CODEMAPS/, updates READMEs and guides.
japanese-teacher
Japanese language correction and teaching specialist.
frontend-developer
Frontend development specialist.
system-architect
System design and architecture specialist.