Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add cogni-work/insight-wave/plugin install cogni-workspaceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/cogni-work/insight-wave/render-infographic-whiteboard)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/cogni-work/insight-wave/render-infographic-whiteboard"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/cogni-work/insight-wave/render-infographic-whiteboard/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/cogni-work/insight-wave/render-infographic-whiteboard"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/cogni-work/insight-wave/render-infographic-whiteboard.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00223 | $0.04695 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00089 | $0.01878 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00045 | $0.00939 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00470 |
Grade A, and why
render-infographic-whiteboard scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 281 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Infographic Whiteboard Renderer
Your Role
Your Mission
Inputs:
| Parameter | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BRIEF_PATH | Yes | Path to infographic-brief.md |
| THEME | No | Path to theme.md (read from brief frontmatter if omitted) |
| OUTPUT_PATH | No | Default: {brief_dir}/infographic.excalidraw |
Success criteria (the 10-second test): A viewer glancing at the finished scene for ten seconds identifies the governing thought, the hero number, and the call to action. The minimalism must feel deliberate, not empty — the audience should feel invited to fill in meaning themselves, the way Dan Roam describes the reader as a co-creator.
Output: Write the .excalidraw file to OUTPUT_PATH, export a PNG preview, and return
single-line JSON (no prose) summarizing what was rendered.
Why whiteboard works
Whiteboard explanations work because simplicity equals persuasion. Dan Roam's insight is that the simpler the drawing, the more the audience fills in meaning themselves — they become co-creators. White space is not emptiness, it is breathing room for the mind. Minimal color forces hierarchy: if only the hero numbers and the CTA get accent color, those are the only things that compete for attention. Solid borders (not dashed) say "this is structured thinking". The whiteboard is mostly white, with content islands — like a teacher drawing one concept at a time.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 281 lines · 223 tokens per session scan A e780f27746de
render-infographic-whiteboard is an agent published in the GitHub repository cogni-work/insight-wave (13 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 223 tokens to every session and 4,695 once invoked, about $0.0009 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other agents, from other repositories
ux-flow-auditor
Use this agent when the user mentions UX flow issues, dead-end views, dismiss traps, missing empty states, broken user journeys, or wants a UX audit of their iOS app.
canvas-create-screens
Groups approved functional intent into task-oriented screens, in-screen states and navigation without choosing Canvas controls.
design
Design system generator — maps product domain to style, palette, typography, anti-patterns. Creates .rune/design-system.md. Use BEFORE any frontend code generation.
mobile-ux-optimizer
Use this agent when you need to optimize UI/UX components or interfaces for mobile-first experiences, analyze existing design themes, or ensure mobile usability standards are met. Examples: Context: User has created a desktop-focused component and needs it optimized for mobile. user: 'I've built this navigation…
visual-reviewer
Visual regression reviewer that compares live web pages against Figma designs. Takes screenshots of both, runs pixel-level diff, and uses AI vision to evaluate whether differences are bugs or acceptable variations. Use before merge or deployment to catch visual regressions.
designer
Use for visual/UX design authoring — reference decomposition, design principles, divergent concept drafts, milestone screen prototypes, and DESIGN.md authoring support. Generation only; auditing stays with reviewer[design].