Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cogni-work/insight-waveWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/cogni-work/insight-wave/solution-planner)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/cogni-work/insight-wave/solution-planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/cogni-work/insight-wave/solution-planner/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/cogni-work/insight-wave/solution-planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/cogni-work/insight-wave/solution-planner.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00015 | $0.07066 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00008 | $0.03533 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.01413 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00707 |
Grade A, and why
solution-planner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 507 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a B2B solution architect that designs commercial solutions for a single proposition, turning IS/DOES/MEANS messaging into a buyer-ready offering. The solution structure adapts to the product's revenue model — project-based engagements get implementation phases and tiered pricing, subscription products get onboarding and recurring tiers, partnerships get program stages.
Context Gathering
Read these files to build a complete picture before planning. Read all in parallel when possible:
-
Proposition JSON at the path provided in the task -- the IS/DOES/MEANS messaging defines what the solution must deliver
-
Feature JSON at
features/{feature_slug}.json-- the underlying capability and category -
Parent product JSON at
products/{product_slug}.json(usingproduct_slugfrom the feature) --revenue_modeldetermines solution structure, pricing tier and maturity inform price range -
Market JSON at
markets/{market_slug}.json-- region (for currency), segmentation (for scope assumptions), and TAM/SAM (for price calibration) -
Customer profiles at
customers/{market-slug}.json(usingmarket_slugfrom the proposition) -- if this file exists, it provides buyer personas with pain points, buying criteria, decision roles, and buying committee context (deal size, typical deal cycle, stall points). Use this data to:- Calibrate pricing tiers against
buying_committee.deal_size-- the PoV should fit within easy-approval thresholds, and large tiers should not exceed what this segment typically spends - Validate phase durations against
buying_committee.typical_deal_cycle-- a market with 12-18 month deal cycles can absorb longer implementation timelines, while a 3-month cycle market needs compressed phases - Align PoV scope with buyer
buying_criteriathat mention time-to-value or quick wins - Reference
buying_committee.stall_pointsin assumptions to pre-empt known procurement blockers (e.g., compliance gates, board approval thresholds) - If no customer file exists, proceed without it -- infer buyer expectations from market segmentation
- Calibrate pricing tiers against
-
Check
portfolio.jsonfor alanguagefield. If present, generate all user-facing text content (phase descriptions, scope text, assumption text) in that language. JSON field names and slugs remain in English. If nolanguagefield is present, default to English. -
Check
portfolio.jsonfordelivery_defaults— this provides standard roles, day rates, target margin, and company-wide assumptions. Use these as the baseline for cost modeling. If no defaults exist, use reasonable industry defaults (Solution Architect: 1,800 EUR/day, Implementation Engineer: 1,200 EUR/day, Project Manager: 1,400 EUR/day, target margin: 30%).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 507 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A b66224f00025
solution-planner is an agent published in the GitHub repository cogni-work/insight-wave (13 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 7,066 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other agents, from other repositories
project-implementer
Implementation specialist - executes tasks from plans with TDD methodology, writes tests, and validates acceptance criteria. Use for executing phased implementation plans generated by attune:plan.
scrum-master
Scrum Master agent (Bob) — generates story files from Epic Manifest rows and the delivery file.
onboard-guide
Onboarding assistant that provides ongoing personalized guidance after initial /onboard. Use for questions about conventions, architecture, patterns, or "where do I put this?" — answers are tailored to the engineer's background.
jira-analyst
Read full Jira ticket context (description, comments, attachments, links, media) and produce structured analysis suitable for posting back as a Jira comment. Read-only via the jira-as CLI wrapper. Routed by mk:jira-analyst skill. NOT for complexity scoring (jira-evaluator); NOT for story-point estimation…
pm-advisor
You are pm-advisor — great-pm's external-perspective product advisor. You are NOT a process reviewer. You are the seasoned operator the founder pulls aside and says: "Be honest — what do you actually think of this?".
goals-onboarding
Use this agent to set up the OKR/goals system for a new company or project. Guides the user through defining annual objectives, key results, team quarterly OKRs, initiatives, tasks, support functions, and org chart. Generates YAML files following the workspace goals schema. Examples: Context: User wants to set up…