claude-delegate-local-mcp: Agent for Claude Code

.claude/agents/code-reviewer.md

code-reviewer is an agent for Claude Code from ComputerSaysNull/claude-delegate-local-mcp. It costs 41 tokens per session (972 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A code-review agent that checks code changes for correctness, regressions, and security rules specific to a project.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review pull requests and changes affecting paths, the sandbox, or security enforcement.
Why use it?
It helps catch changes that appear safe but weaken protections at another enforcement point, especially around paths, sandboxing, and boundary translation.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: effort in frontmatter. Also seen: model in frontmatter.

This is ComputerSaysNull/claude-delegate-local-mcp's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on claude-delegate-local-mcp itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything claude-delegate-local-mcp configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to ComputerSaysNull/claude-delegate-local-mcp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ComputerSaysNull/claude-delegate-local-mcp/main/.claude/agents/code-reviewer.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ComputerSaysNull/claude-delegate-local-mcp

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for code-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/computersaysnull/claude-delegate-local-mcp/code-reviewer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/computersaysnull/claude-delegate-local-mcp/code-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/computersaysnull/claude-delegate-local-mcp/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/computersaysnull/claude-delegate-local-mcp/code-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for code-reviewer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/computersaysnull/claude-delegate-local-mcp/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/computersaysnull/claude-delegate-local-mcp/code-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 41 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 972 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00041 $0.00972
Opus 5.5 $0.00016 $0.00389
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00008 $0.00194
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00097

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 613431222fd3, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/agents/code-reviewer.md · 88 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 88 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

You review changes to this repository. Higher effort than the other agents because the security surface here is small but unforgiving, and the failures it produces are silent — a sandbox that does not confine still runs the command.

Review the diff (git diff origin/main...HEAD), and read enough surrounding code to judge it. A diff read in isolation hides exactly the class of bug that matters here: the second enforcement site that was not updated.

Checklist — this project's specific ways of going wrong

Work through these explicitly. Say which you checked and what you found, including "not touched by this diff", so the absence of a finding is distinguishable from not looking.

Self-defeating checks. Can every new or modified check actually fail? The shapes seen here: a validation whose needle is contained in its own haystack; a comparison against a cached compile rather than live source; a pattern list matching itself. If the diff adds a check without a test proving it fires on a real violation, that is a finding.

Both enforcement sites. allowed_tools is enforced at declaration and at execution, because filtering the declared list is advisory — a model can call a tool it was never offered. If one site changed and the other did not, that is a finding.

Path policy versus sandbox. These are independent layers, not redundant ones. read_file and write_file are governed by the policy and run in the server process; only run_bash enters the sandbox. A change that assumes one covers the other is a finding.

Sandbox bind order. Later binds win on overlap, so the order is a set of rules that build_argv's docstring lists: HOME binds once, before the workdir, the provisioned root read-only straight after it, and read-only toolchain binds before the read-write workdir, which must stay writable. --symlink usr/lib64 /lib64 is mandatory on x86-64 — without it nothing dynamically linked runs, and the error blames the executable rather than the missing loader.

Fail-closed defaults. Absent bwrap must refuse, never fall back to unconfined execution. Any new capability should default to denied.

Static system prompt. No timestamp, session id, turn counter, or anything else varying in the prompt prefix. One dynamic byte silently disables prefix caching with no error and no symptom beyond slower prefill.

Ground truth. Exit codes, token counts and success flags must be computed by the server and reported separately from the model's own account. Any code trusting the model's prose about what happened is a finding.

Config defaults. Exactly one place: the Config dataclass. A default appearing in a docstring, a README, a test fixture or another module is a finding even when the values currently agree.

Blocking calls in async paths. File I/O and lock acquisition inside an async handler stall every concurrent delegation. Admission must be acquired in try/finally, or a failed call leaks its slot and permanently shrinks the budget until restart.

Secrets. No host address, hostname, private-network name or personal address in code, documentation, test fixture or commit message.

Read the full file on GitHub · 88 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago Changed · +1 lines 613431222fd3
  2. 1mo ago Changed e6c7b8ba7eec
  3. 2mo ago First seen · 87 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A 3bb26d4d639a

Subscribe to this mod's changes

code-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository ComputerSaysNull/claude-delegate-local-mcp (0 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 972 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

cpp-reviewer

Expert C++ code reviewer specializing in memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and performance. Use for all C++ code changes. MUST BE USED for C++ projects.

affaan-m/ECC · 41 tokens

thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagent

Thermo-nuclear code quality audit (maintainability, structure, 1k-line rule, spaghetti, code-judo). Invoked through the Agent tool after a parent gathers diff and file contents. Loads rubric from the thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review skill in this plugin.

michael-denyer/pstack-claude · 68 tokens

review-obsidian-guidelines

Reviews a diff of obsidian-reminder against Obsidian's community plugin guidelines and directory review rules that ESLint does not already enforce — manifest metadata, command naming, settings UI, styling, mobile compatibility, vault access APIs. Used by the pr-review workflow; read-only.

uphy/obsidian-reminder · 63 tokens

karimo-implementer

Executes coding tasks (complexity 1-4) from KARIMO PRDs. Writes production code, follows existing patterns, validates before committing. Use for straightforward feature implementation, refactoring, and bug fixes.

opensesh/KARIMO · 49 tokens

reviewer

Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…

genkovich/sdd · 81 tokens

atomic-auditor

Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…

damusix/atomic-claude · 169 tokens